mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Reflective Preference Optimization (RPO): Enhancing On-Policy Alignment via Hint-Guided Reflection

arXiv 2512.13240 ↗First posted 15 Dec 2025cs.AI cs.LGcited by 3

On the map: Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models → Embodied and 3D vision-language models

also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)

Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) has emerged as a lightweight and effective alternative to Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) and Reinforcement Learning with AI Feedback (RLAIF) for aligning large language and vision-language models. However, the standard DPO formulation, in which both the chosen and rejected responses are generated by the same policy, suffers from a weak learning signal because the two responses often share similar errors and exhibit small Kullback-Leibler (KL) divergence. This leads to slow and unstable convergence. To address this limitation, we introduce Reflective Preference Optimization (RPO), a new framework that incorporates hint-guided reflection into the DPO paradigm. RPO uses external models to identify hallucination sources and generate concise reflective hints, enabling the construction of on-policy preference pairs with stronger contrastiveness and clearer preference signals. We theoretically show that conditioning on hints increases the expected preference margin through mutual information and improves sample efficiency while remaining within the policy distribution family. Empirically, RPO achieves superior alignment with fewer training samples and iterations, substantially reducing hallucination rates and delivering state-of-the-art performance across multimodal benchmarks.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Embodied and 3D vision-language models, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models. Builds on 40 of its 46 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Dec 2025.

Builds on

40 of 46 references.

References · 40

  1. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
  2. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
  3. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,396
  4. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
  5. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 15,215
  6. 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 14,132
  7. 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 8,065
  8. 2023Visual Instruction Tuningcited by 7,869
  9. 2023BLIP-2: Bootstrapping Language-Image Pre-training with Frozen Image Encoders and Large Language Modelscited by 6,137
  10. 2023Improved Baselines with Visual Instruction Tuningcited by 4,418
  11. 2022Flamingo: a Visual Language Model for Few-Shot Learningcited by 4,386
  12. 2017Deep reinforcement learning from human preferencescited by 3,912
28 more
  1. 2023Qwen Technical Reportcited by 3,344
  2. 2024Gemini 1.5: Unlocking multimodal understanding across millions of tokens of contextcited by 3,224
  3. 2023InstructBLIP: Towards General-purpose Vision-Language Models with Instruction Tuningcited by 2,876
  4. 2023Evaluating Object Hallucination in Large Vision-Language Modelscited by 1,729
  5. 2024SimPO: Simple Preference Optimization with a Reference-Free Rewardcited by 963
  6. 2023Aligning Large Multimodal Models with Factually Augmented RLHFcited by 712
  7. 2018Object Hallucination in Image Captioningcited by 669
  8. 2024ORPO: Monolithic Preference Optimization without Reference Modelcited by 562
  9. 2023RLHF-V: Towards Trustworthy MLLMs via Behavior Alignment from Fine-grained Correctional Human Feedbackcited by 412
  10. 2024Contrastive Preference Optimization: Pushing the Boundaries of LLM Performance in Machine Translationcited by 394
  11. 2024Hallucination of Multimodal Large Language Models: A Surveycited by 388
  12. 2024A Survey on Hallucination in Large Vision-Language Modelscited by 357
  13. 2023AMBER: An LLM-free Multi-dimensional Benchmark for MLLMs Hallucination Evaluationcited by 300
  14. 2023Beyond Hallucinations: Enhancing LVLMs through Hallucination-Aware Direct Preference Optimizationcited by 225
  15. 2024Aligning Modalities in Vision Large Language Models via Preference Fine-tuningcited by 198
  16. 2024MAIRA-2: Grounded Radiology Report Generationcited by 145
  17. 2024RLAIF-V: Open-Source AI Feedback Leads to Super GPT-4V Trustworthinesscited by 131
  18. 2024mDPO: Conditional Preference Optimization for Multimodal Large Language Modelscited by 92
  19. 2024Detecting and Mitigating Hallucination in Large Vision Language Models via Fine-Grained AI Feedbackcited by 80
  20. 2023MAIRA-1: A specialised large multimodal model for radiology report generationcited by 74
  21. 2025Mitigating Hallucinations in Large Vision-Language Models via DPO: On-Policy Data Hold the Keycited by 65
  22. 2024VLFeedback: A Large-Scale AI Feedback Dataset for Large Vision-Language Models Alignmentcited by 58
  23. 2024Mitigating Object Hallucination in MLLMs via Data-augmented Phrase-level Alignmentcited by 42
  24. 2025Test-Time Preference Optimization: On-the-Fly Alignment via Iterative Textual Feedbackcited by 41
  25. 2024Mitigating Hallucinations in Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) via Language-Contrastive Decoding (LCD)cited by 23
  26. 2024Skip n: A Simple Method to Reduce Hallucination in Large Vision-Language Modelscited by 9
  27. 2024Hallucination in Multimodal Foundation Models: A Survey on Causes, Corrections, and Evaluationscited by 8
  28. 2025Mitigating Hallucinations via Inter-Layer Consistency Aggregation in Large Vision-Language Modelscited by 7

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 2.

3 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024A Comprehensive Survey of Direct Preference Optimization: Datasets, Theories, Variants, and Applications
  2. 2026Conditional Equivalence of DPO and RLHF: Implicit Assumption, Failure Modes, and Provable Alignment
  3. 2024Reinforcement Learning from Reflective Feedback (RLRF): Aligning and Improving LLMs via Fine-Grained Self-Reflection
  4. 2024Back to Basics: Revisiting REINFORCE Style Optimization for Learning from Human Feedback in LLMs
  5. 2026A Unified Pair-GRPO Family: From Implicit to Explicit Preference Constraints for Stable and General RL Alignment
  6. 2024WPO: Enhancing RLHF with Weighted Preference Optimization
  7. 2023Beyond Reverse KL: Generalizing Direct Preference Optimization with Diverse Divergence Constraints
  8. 2024New Desiderata for Direct Preference Optimization