mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

PerNodeDrop: A Method Balancing Specialized Subnets and Regularization in Deep Neural Networks

arXiv 2512.12663 ↗First posted 14 Dec 2025cs.LG cs.AI cs.CVcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Deep neural networks possess strong representational capacity yet remain vulnerable to overfitting, primarily because neurons tend to co-adapt in ways that, while capturing complex and fine-grained feature interactions, also reinforce spurious and non-generalizable patterns that inflate training performance but reduce reliability on unseen data. Noise-based regularizers such as Dropout and DropConnect address this issue by injecting stochastic perturbations during training, but the noise they apply is typically uniform across a layer or across a batch of samples, which can suppress both harmful and beneficial co-adaptation. This work introduces PerNodeDrop, a lightweight stochastic regularization method. It applies per-sample, per-node perturbations to break the uniformity of the noise injected by existing techniques, thereby allowing each node to experience input-specific variability. Hence, PerNodeDrop preserves useful co-adaptation while applying regularization. This narrows the gap between training and validation performance and improves reliability on unseen data, as evident from the experiments. Although superficially similar to DropConnect, PerNodeDrop operates at the sample level. It drops weights at the sample level, not the batch level. An expected-loss analysis formalizes how its perturbations attenuate excessive co-adaptation while retaining predictive interactions. Empirical evaluations on vision, text, and audio benchmarks indicate improved generalization relative to the standard noise-based regularizer.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Dec 2025.

Builds on

20 of 39 references.

References · 20

  1. 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,448
  2. 2016Simple and Scalable Predictive Uncertainty Estimation using Deep Ensemblescited by 3,926
  3. 2017Outrageously Large Neural Networks: The Sparsely-Gated Mixture-of-Experts Layercited by 3,509
  4. 2017What Uncertainties Do We Need in Bayesian Deep Learning for Computer Vision?cited by 2,352
  5. 2016Deep Networks with Stochastic Depthcited by 979
  6. 2017A Closer Look at Memorization in Deep Networkscited by 942
  7. 2018Speech Commands: A Dataset for Limited-Vocabulary Speech Recognitioncited by 752
  8. 2017Dynamic Routing Between Capsulescited by 689
  9. 2017BranchyNet: Fast Inference via Early Exiting from Deep Neural Networkscited by 596
  10. 2015Variational Dropout and the Local Reparameterization Trickcited by 490
  11. 2017Snapshot Ensembles: Train 1, get M for freecited by 350
  12. 2018DropBlock: A regularization method for convolutional networkscited by 262
8 more
  1. 2014Efficient Object Localization Using Convolutional Networkscited by 227
  2. 2016FractalNet: Ultra-Deep Neural Networks without Residualscited by 216
  3. 2021R-Drop: Regularized Dropout for Neural Networkscited by 202
  4. 2015Adding Gradient Noise Improves Learning for Very Deep Networkscited by 145
  5. 2013Dropout Training as Adaptive Regularizationcited by 93
  6. 2020Masksembles for Uncertainty Estimationcited by 88
  7. 2017Curriculum Dropoutcited by 50
  8. 2024Gradient Routing: Masking Gradients to Localize Computation in Neural Networkscited by 34

Built on by

Not cited yet.