mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Pre-training vision models for the classification of alerts from wide-field time-domain surveys

arXiv 2512.11957 ↗First posted 12 Dec 2025astro-ph.IM cs.CVcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Modern wide-field time-domain surveys facilitate the study of transient, variable and moving phenomena by conducting image differencing and relaying alerts to their communities. Machine learning tools have been used on data from these surveys and their precursors for more than a decade, and convolutional neural networks (CNNs), which make predictions directly from input images, saw particularly broad adoption through the 2010s. Since then, continually rapid advances in computer vision have transformed the standard practices around using such models. It is now commonplace to use standardized architectures pre-trained on large corpora of everyday images (e.g., ImageNet). In contrast, time-domain astronomy studies still typically design custom CNN architectures and train them from scratch. Here, we explore the effects of adopting various pre-training regimens and standardized model architectures on the performance of alert classification. We find that the resulting models match or outperform a custom, specialized CNN like what is typically used for filtering alerts. Moreover, our results show that pre-training on galaxy images from Galaxy Zoo tends to yield better performance than pre-training on ImageNet or training from scratch. We observe that the design of standardized architectures are much better optimized than the custom CNN baseline, requiring significantly less time and memory for inference despite having more trainable parameters. On the eve of the Legacy Survey of Space and Time and other image-differencing surveys, these findings advocate for a paradigm shift in the creation of vision models for alerts, demonstrating that greater performance and efficiency, in time and in data, can be achieved by adopting the latest practices from the computer vision field.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 82 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Dec 2025.

Builds on

11 of 82 references.

References · 11

  1. 2021Transformers in Vision: A Surveycited by 1,013
  2. 2016Places: An Image Database for Deep Scene Understandingcited by 76
  3. 2021Practical Galaxy Morphology Tools from Deep Supervised Representation Learningcited by 15
  4. 2017Deep-HiTS: Rotation Invariant Convolutional Neural Network for Transient Detectioncited by 12
  5. 2020Alert Classification for the ALeRCE Broker System: The Real-time Stamp Classifiercited by 10
  6. 2021Tails: Chasing Comets with the Zwicky Transient Facility and Deep Learningcited by 6
  7. 2017Effective Image Differencing with ConvNets for Real-time Transient Huntingcited by 4
  8. 2022What's the Difference? The potential for Convolutional Neural Networks for transient detection without template subtractioncited by 4
  9. 2025Transfer Learning for Transient Classification: From Simulations to Real Data and ZTF to LSSTcited by 3
  10. 2025Textual interpretation of transient image classifications from large language modelscited by 3
  11. 2022Learning to Detect Interesting Anomaliescited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.