mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

What's the Difference? The potential for Convolutional Neural Networks for transient detection without template subtraction

arXiv 2203.07390 ↗First posted 14 Mar 2022cs.CV astro-ph.IMcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We present a study of the potential for Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) to enable separation of astrophysical transients from image artifacts, a task known as "real-bogus" classification without requiring a template subtracted (or difference) image which requires a computationally expensive process to generate, involving image matching on small spatial scales in large volumes of data. Using data from the Dark Energy Survey, we explore the use of CNNs to (1) automate the "real-bogus" classification, (2) reduce the computational costs of transient discovery. We compare the efficiency of two CNNs with similar architectures, one that uses "image triplets" (templates, search, and difference image) and one that takes as input the template and search only. We measure the decrease in efficiency associated with the loss of information in input finding that the testing accuracy is reduced from 96% to 91.1%. We further investigate how the latter model learns the required information from the template and search by exploring the saliency maps. Our work (1) confirms that CNNs are excellent models for "real-bogus" classification that rely exclusively on the imaging data and require no feature engineering task; (2) demonstrates that high-accuracy (> 90%) models can be built without the need to construct difference images, but some accuracy is lost. Since once trained, neural networks can generate predictions at minimal computational costs, we argue that future implementations of this methodology could dramatically reduce the computational costs in the detection of transients in synoptic surveys like Rubin Observatory's Legacy Survey of Space and Time by bypassing the Difference Image Analysis entirely.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 48 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Mar 2022.

Builds on

9 of 48 references.

References · 9

  1. 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,364
  2. 2013Deep Inside Convolutional Networks: Visualising Image Classification Models and Saliency Mapscited by 2,371
  3. 2016Identity Mappings in Deep Residual Networkscited by 1,965
  4. 2015Rotation-invariant convolutional neural networks for galaxy morphology predictioncited by 83
  5. 2017Deep-HiTS: Rotation Invariant Convolutional Neural Network for Transient Detectioncited by 12
  6. 2020Alert Classification for the ALeRCE Broker System: The Real-time Stamp Classifiercited by 10
  7. 2016Star-galaxy Classification Using Deep Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 7
  8. 2017Effective Image Differencing with ConvNets for Real-time Transient Huntingcited by 4
  9. 2020Detecting optical transients using artificial neural networks and reference images from different surveyscited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 3.

4 papers.