The Agentic Regulator: Risks for AI in Finance and a Proposed Agent-based Framework for Governance
On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Financial trading and forecasting agents
Abstract (arXiv)
Generative and agentic artificial intelligence is entering financial markets faster than existing governance can adapt. Current model-risk frameworks assume static, well-specified algorithms and one-time validations; large language models and multi-agent trading systems violate those assumptions by learning continuously, exchanging latent signals, and exhibiting emergent behavior. Drawing on complex adaptive systems theory, we model these technologies as decentralized ensembles whose risks propagate along multiple time-scales. We then propose a modular governance architecture. The framework decomposes oversight into four layers of "regulatory blocks": (i) self-regulation modules embedded beside each model, (ii) firm-level governance blocks that aggregate local telemetry and enforce policy, (iii) regulator-hosted agents that monitor sector-wide indicators for collusive or destabilizing patterns, and (iv) independent audit blocks that supply third-party assurance. Eight design strategies enable the blocks to evolve as fast as the models they police. A case study on emergent spoofing in multi-agent trading shows how the layered controls quarantine harmful behavior in real time while preserving innovation. The architecture remains compatible with today's model-risk rules yet closes critical observability and control gaps, providing a practical path toward resilient, adaptive AI governance in financial systems.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Financial trading and forecasting agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 4 of its 69 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Dec 2025.
Builds on
4 of 69 references.
References · 4
- 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,411
- 2019Hidden Trigger Backdoor Attackscited by 359
- 2021Ethics-Based Auditing to Develop Trustworthy AIcited by 23
- 2023Learning Not to Spoofcited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.
3 papers.
- 2026Agentic Problem Frames: A Systematic Approach to Engineering Reliable Domain Agentscited by 1
- 2026Auditing Asset-Specific Preferences in Financial Large Language Models: Evidence from Bitcoin Representations and Portfolio Allocationcited by 1
- 2026Mechanical Enforcement for LLM Governance:Evidence of Governance-Task Decoupling in Financial Decision Systemscited by 0
- 2026Auditing Asset-Specific Preferences in Financial Large Language Models: Evidence from Bitcoin Representations and Portfolio Allocation1 Jun 2026
- 2026Mechanical Enforcement for LLM Governance:Evidence of Governance-Task Decoupling in Financial Decision Systems14 May 2026
- 2026Agentic Problem Frames: A Systematic Approach to Engineering Reliable Domain Agents22 Feb 2026
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Compliant with Local Controls, Collectively Discriminatory. A Governance Architecture for Multi-Agent AI in Regulated Finance
- 2026Governing Agentic AI in FinTech
- 2026Agent Security Meets Regulatory Reality -- A Practitioner Systematization of Autonomous-Agent Threats and Controls in Regulated Financial Systems
- 2026Agentic AI, Retrieval-Augmented Generation, and the Institutional Turn: Legal Architectures and Financial Governance in the Age of Distributional AGI
- 2026Financial Fragility in Societies of LLM Agents: Coordination Failures and Stabilizing Mechanisms
- 2026SoK: Trading Agents or Market Crashers? Dissecting Robustness and Security Failures in Academic Financial LLM Trading Schemes
- 2026AlphaCrafter: Harnessing Multi-Agent Workflows for Cross-Sectional Quantitative Trading
- 2025Agentic AI for Financial Crime Compliance