mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

SpectralKrum: A Spectral-Geometric Defense Against Byzantine Attacks in Federated Learning

arXiv 2512.11760 ↗First posted 12 Dec 2025cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Federated Learning (FL) distributes model training across clients who retain their data locally, but this architecture exposes a fundamental vulnerability: Byzantine clients can inject arbitrarily corrupted updates that degrade or subvert the global model. While robust aggregation methods (including Krum, Bulyan, and coordinate-wise defenses) offer theoretical guarantees under idealized assumptions, their effectiveness erodes substantially when client data distributions are heterogeneous (non-IID) and adversaries can observe or approximate the defense mechanism. This paper introduces SpectralKrum, a defense that fuses spectral subspace estimation with geometric neighbor-based selection. The core insight is that benign optimization trajectories, despite per-client heterogeneity, concentrate near a low-dimensional manifold that can be estimated from historical aggregates. SpectralKrum projects incoming updates into this learned subspace, applies Krum selection in compressed coordinates, and filters candidates whose orthogonal residual energy exceeds a data-driven threshold. The method requires no auxiliary data, operates entirely on model updates, and preserves FL privacy properties. We evaluate SpectralKrum against eight robust baselines across seven attack scenarios on CIFAR-10 with Dirichlet-distributed non-IID partitions (alpha = 0.1). Experiments spanning over 56,000 training rounds show that SpectralKrum is competitive against directional and subspace-aware attacks (adaptive-steer, buffer-drift), but offers limited advantage under label-flip and min-max attacks where malicious updates remain spectrally indistinguishable from benign ones.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 28 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Dec 2025.

Builds on

14 of 28 references.

References · 14

  1. 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,669
  2. 2019Advances and Open Problems in Federated Learningcited by 3,046
  3. 2018Federated Optimization in Heterogeneous Networkscited by 2,987
  4. 2019Measuring the Effects of Non-Identical Data Distribution for Federated Visual Classificationcited by 851
  5. 2018How To Backdoor Federated Learningcited by 765
  6. 2018Byzantine-Robust Distributed Learning: Towards Optimal Statistical Ratescited by 711
  7. 2020The Future of Digital Health with Federated Learningcited by 633
  8. 2018Federated Learning for Mobile Keyboard Predictioncited by 572
  9. 2019Local Model Poisoning Attacks to Byzantine-Robust Federated Learningcited by 493
  10. 2020FLTrust: Byzantine-robust Federated Learning via Trust Bootstrappingcited by 346
  11. 2018The Hidden Vulnerability of Distributed Learning in Byzantiumcited by 329
  12. 2019Can You Really Backdoor Federated Learning?cited by 255
2 more
  1. 2017Distributed Statistical Machine Learning in Adversarial Settings: Byzantine Gradient Descentcited by 59
  2. 2020Byzantine-Resilient Non-Convex Stochastic Gradient Descentcited by 57

Built on by

Not cited yet.