mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

CAT: Can Trust be Predicted with Context-Awareness in Dynamic Heterogeneous Networks?

arXiv 2512.11352 ↗First posted 12 Dec 2025cs.LGcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Trust prediction provides valuable support for decision-making, risk mitigation, and system security enhancement. Recently, Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) have emerged as a promising approach for trust prediction, owing to their ability to learn expressive node representations that capture intricate trust relationships within a network. However, current GNN-based trust prediction models face several limitations: (i) Most of them fail to capture trust dynamicity, leading to questionable inferences. (ii) They rarely consider the heterogeneous nature of real-world networks, resulting in a loss of rich semantics. (iii) None of them support context-awareness, a basic property of trust, making prediction results coarse-grained. To this end, we propose CAT, the first Context-Aware GNN-based Trust prediction model that supports trust dynamicity and accurately represents real-world heterogeneity. CAT consists of a graph construction layer, an embedding layer, a heterogeneous attention layer, and a prediction layer. It handles dynamic graphs using continuous-time representations and captures temporal information through a time encoding function. To model graph heterogeneity and leverage semantic information, CAT employs a dual attention mechanism that identifies the importance of different node types and nodes within each type. For context-awareness, we introduce a new notion of meta-paths to extract contextual features. By constructing context embeddings and integrating a context-aware aggregator, CAT can predict both context-aware trust and overall trust. Extensive experiments on three real-world datasets demonstrate that CAT outperforms five groups of baselines in trust prediction, while exhibiting strong scalability to large-scale graphs and robustness against both trust-oriented and GNN-oriented attacks.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 31 of its 64 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Dec 2025.

Builds on

31 of 64 references.

References · 31

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  3. 2017Inductive Representation Learning on Large Graphscited by 6,284
  4. 2016Variational Graph Auto-Encoderscited by 1,373
  5. 2018Link Prediction Based on Graph Neural Networkscited by 829
  6. 2019Heterogeneous Graph Attention Networkcited by 732
  7. 2019Graph Neural Networks for Social Recommendationcited by 711
  8. 2019Measuring and Relieving the Over-smoothing Problem for Graph Neural Networks from the Topological Viewcited by 544
  9. 2020Temporal Graph Networks for Deep Learning on Dynamic Graphscited by 521
  10. 2020Inductive Representation Learning on Temporal Graphscited by 454
  11. 2020GNNGuard: Defending Graph Neural Networks against Adversarial Attackscited by 195
  12. 2019Adversarial Training and Robustness for Multiple Perturbationscited by 182
19 more
  1. 2023Do We Really Need Complicated Model Architectures For Temporal Networks?cited by 141
  2. 2023Evaluating Graph Neural Networks for Link Prediction: Current Pitfalls and New Benchmarkingcited by 69
  3. 2020UNICORN: Runtime Provenance-Based Detector for Advanced Persistent Threatscited by 53
  4. 2021ConsisRec: Enhancing GNN for Social Recommendation via Consistent Neighbor Aggregationcited by 39
  5. 2021A Hard Label Black-box Adversarial Attack Against Graph Neural Networkscited by 26
  6. 2020Modeling Dynamic Heterogeneous Network for Link Prediction using Hierarchical Attention with Temporal RNNcited by 23
  7. 2021Heterogeneous Temporal Graph Neural Networkcited by 23
  8. 2024Can Large Language Models Improve the Adversarial Robustness of Graph Neural Networks?cited by 22
  9. 2023MAGIC: Detecting Advanced Persistent Threats via Masked Graph Representation Learningcited by 20
  10. 2023Exploring ChatGPT's Capabilities on Vulnerability Managementcited by 19
  11. 2018Graph-based Security and Privacy Analytics via Collective Classification with Joint Weight Learning and Propagationcited by 14
  12. 2023TrustGuard: GNN-based Robust and Explainable Trust Evaluation with Dynamicity Supportcited by 12
  13. 2024Learning on Graphs with Large Language Models(LLMs): A Deep Dive into Model Robustnesscited by 11
  14. 2022TrustGNN: Graph Neural Network based Trust Evaluation via Learnable Propagative and Composable Naturecited by 10
  15. 2023KGTrust: Evaluating Trustworthiness of SIoT via Knowledge Enhanced Graph Neural Networkscited by 9
  16. 2023Spear and Shield: Adversarial Attacks and Defense Methods for Model-Based Link Prediction on Continuous-Time Dynamic Graphscited by 9
  17. 2025GRID: Protecting Training Graph from Link Stealing Attacks on GNN Modelscited by 4
  18. 2019Trust Assessment in Online Social Networkscited by 2
  19. 2022SiamHAN: IPv6 Address Correlation Attacks on TLS Encrypted Traffic via Siamese Heterogeneous Graph Attention Networkcited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.