mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Simple Yet Effective Selective Imputation for Incomplete Multi-view Clustering

arXiv 2512.10327 ↗First posted 11 Dec 2025cs.CV cs.MMcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Incomplete Multi-view Clustering (IMC) has emerged as a significant challenge in multi-view learning. A predominant line for IMC is data imputation; however, indiscriminate imputation can result in unreliable content. Recently, researchers have proposed selective imputation methods that use a post-imputation assessment strategy: (1) impute all or some missing values, and (2) evaluate their quality through clustering tasks. We observe that this strategy incurs substantial computational complexity and is heavily dependent on the performance of the clustering model. To address these challenges, we first introduce the concept of pre-imputation assessment. We propose an Implicit Informativeness-based Selective Imputation (SI3) method for incomplete multi-view clustering, which explicitly addresses the trade-off between imputation utility and imputation risk. SI3 evaluates the imputation-relevant informativeness of each missing position in a training-free manner, and selectively imputes data only when sufficient informative support is available. Under a multi-view generative assumption, SI3 further integrates selective imputation into a variational inference framework, enabling uncertainty-aware imputation at the latent distribution level and robust multi-view fusion. Compared with existing selective imputation strategies, SI3 is lightweight, data-driven, and model-agnostic, and can be seamlessly incorporated into existing incomplete multi-view clustering frameworks as a plug-in strategy. Extensive experiments on multiple benchmark datasets demonstrate that SI3 consistently outperforms both imputation-based and imputation-free methods, particularly under challenging unbalanced missing scenarios.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 49 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Dec 2025.

Builds on

19 of 49 references.

References · 19

  1. 2017Fashion-MNIST: a Novel Image Dataset for Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithmscited by 4,283
  2. 2023A Survey on Multimodal Large Language Modelscited by 898
  3. 2016Deep Unsupervised Clustering with Gaussian Mixture Variational Autoencoderscited by 219
  4. 2016Variational Deep Embedding: An Unsupervised and Generative Approach to Clusteringcited by 219
  5. 2021Trusted Multi-View Classificationcited by 94
  6. 2016Joint Multimodal Learning with Deep Generative Modelscited by 87
  7. 2018Learning Disentangled Joint Continuous and Discrete Representationscited by 83
  8. 2020Deep Partial Multi-View Learningcited by 71
  9. 2021Multi-VAE: Learning Disentangled View-common and View-peculiar Visual Representations for Multi-view Clusteringcited by 51
  10. 2017VIGAN: Missing View Imputation with Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 33
  11. 2023Deep Incomplete Multi-view Clustering with Cross-view Partial Sample and Prototype Alignmentcited by 33
  12. 2020Unbalanced Incomplete Multi-view Clustering via the Scheme of View Evolution: Weak Views are Meat; Strong Views do Eatcited by 30
7 more
  1. 2017Multi-View Image Generation from a Single-Viewcited by 27
  2. 2019Shared Generative Latent Representation Learning for Multi-view Clusteringcited by 17
  3. 2023Exploring and Exploiting Uncertainty for Incomplete Multi-View Classificationcited by 13
  4. 2024Unified View Imputation and Feature Selection Learning for Incomplete Multi-view Datacited by 3
  5. 2024URRL-IMVC: Unified and Robust Representation Learning for Incomplete Multi-View Clusteringcited by 2
  6. 2025M^2VAE: Multi-Modal Multi-View Variational Autoencoder for Cold-start Item Recommendationcited by 1
  7. 2025Advanced Unsupervised Learning: A Comprehensive Overview of Multi-View Clustering Techniquescited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.