mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Incorporating Fairness in Neighborhood Graphs for Fair Spectral Clustering

arXiv 2512.09810 ↗First posted 10 Dec 2025cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Graph clustering plays a pivotal role in unsupervised learning methods like spectral clustering, yet traditional methods for graph clustering often perpetuate bias through unfair graph constructions that may underrepresent some groups. The current research introduces novel approaches for constructing fair k-nearest neighbor (kNN) and fair epsilon-neighborhood graphs that proactively enforce demographic parity during graph formation. By incorporating fairness constraints at the earliest stage of neighborhood selection steps, our approaches incorporate proportional representation of sensitive features into the local graph structure while maintaining geometric consistency.Our work addresses a critical gap in pre-processing for fair spectral clustering, demonstrating that topological fairness in graph construction is essential for achieving equitable clustering outcomes. Widely used graph construction methods like kNN and epsilon-neighborhood graphs propagate edge based disparate impact on sensitive groups, leading to biased clustering results. Providing representation of each sensitive group in the neighborhood of every node leads to fairer spectral clustering results because the topological features of the graph naturally reflect equitable group ratios. This research fills an essential shortcoming in fair unsupervised learning, by illustrating how topological fairness in graph construction inherently facilitates fairer spectral clustering results without the need for changes to the clustering algorithm itself. Thorough experiments on three synthetic datasets, seven real-world tabular datasets, and three real-world image datasets prove that our fair graph construction methods surpass the current baselines in graph clustering tasks.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 53 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Dec 2025.

Builds on

21 of 53 references.

References · 21

  1. 2014Certifying and removing disparate impactcited by 715
  2. 2018Fair Clustering Through Fairletscited by 176
  3. 2019Fair Algorithms for Clusteringcited by 98
  4. 2019Scalable Fair Clusteringcited by 78
  5. 2019Guarantees for Spectral Clustering with Fairness Constraintscited by 72
  6. 2021FairDrop: Biased Edge Dropout for Enhancing Fairness in Graph Representation Learningcited by 68
  7. 2022Algorithmic Fairness Datasets: the Story so Farcited by 51
  8. 2018On the cost of essentially fair clusteringscited by 44
  9. 2020Fairness in Risk Assessment Instruments: Post-Processing to Achieve Counterfactual Equalized Oddscited by 40
  10. 2018Robust Graph Learning from Noisy Datacited by 34
  11. 2021Structured Graph Learning for Scalable Subspace Clustering: From Single-view to Multi-viewcited by 30
  12. 2020Fair Hierarchical Clusteringcited by 25
9 more
  1. 2021Fair Representation: Guaranteeing Approximate Multiple Group Fairness for Unknown Taskscited by 16
  2. 2022Scalable Spectral Clustering with Group Fairness Constraintscited by 16
  3. 2024CDC: A Simple Framework for Complex Data Clusteringcited by 15
  4. 2020Fair Algorithms for Hierarchical Agglomerative Clusteringcited by 10
  5. 2021Consistency of Constrained Spectral Clustering under Graph Induced Fair Planted Partitionscited by 10
  6. 2021A Stochastic Alternating Balance k-Means Algorithm for Fair Clusteringcited by 10
  7. 2020Fair Clustering with Multiple Colorscited by 9
  8. 2023Generalized Disparate Impact for Configurable Fairness Solutions in MLcited by 7
  9. 2014Data mining for censored time-to-event data: A Bayesian network model for predicting cardiovascular risk from electronic health record datacited by 4

Built on by

Not cited yet.