mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Identifying counterfactual probabilities using bivariate distributions and uplift modeling

arXiv 2512.08805 ↗First posted 9 Dec 2025cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Uplift modeling estimates the causal effect of an intervention as the difference between potential outcomes under treatment and control, whereas counterfactual identification aims to recover the joint distribution of these potential outcomes (e.g., "Would this customer still have churned had we given them a marketing offer?"). This joint counterfactual distribution provides richer information than the uplift but is harder to estimate. However, the two approaches are synergistic: uplift models can be leveraged for counterfactual estimation. We propose a counterfactual estimator that fits a bivariate beta distribution to predicted uplift scores, yielding posterior distributions over counterfactual outcomes. Our approach requires no causal assumptions beyond those of uplift modeling. Simulations show the efficacy of the approach, which can be applied, for example, to the problem of customer churn in telecom, where it reveals insights unavailable to standard ML or uplift models alone.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 14 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Dec 2025.

Builds on

6 of 14 references.

References · 6

  1. 2020Algorithmic Recourse: from Counterfactual Explanations to Interventionscited by 250
  2. 2013Probabilities of Causation: Bounds and Identificationcited by 90
  3. 2021Partial Counterfactual Identification from Observational and Experimental Datacited by 64
  4. 2021Causes of Effects: Learning individual responses from population datacited by 37
  5. 2014Constructions for a bivariate beta distributioncited by 4
  6. 2022Partial counterfactual identification and uplift modeling: theoretical results and real-world assessmentcited by 3

Built on by

Not cited yet.