The SMART+ Framework for AI Systems
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Artificial Intelligence (AI) systems are now an integral part of multiple industries. In clinical research, AI supports automated adverse event detection in clinical trials, patient eligibility screening for protocol enrollment, and data quality validation. Beyond healthcare, AI is transforming finance through real-time fraud detection, automated loan risk assessment, and algorithmic decision-making. Similarly, in manufacturing, AI enables predictive maintenance to reduce equipment downtime, enhances quality control through computer-vision inspection, and optimizes production workflows using real-time operational data. While these technologies enhance operational efficiency, they introduce new challenges regarding safety, accountability, and regulatory compliance. To address these concerns, we introduce the SMART+ Framework - a structured model built on the pillars of Safety, Monitoring, Accountability, Reliability, and Transparency, and further enhanced with Privacy & Security, Data Governance, Fairness & Bias, and Guardrails. SMART+ offers a practical, comprehensive approach to evaluating and governing AI systems across industries. This framework aligns with evolving mechanisms and regulatory guidance to integrate operational safeguards, oversight procedures, and strengthened privacy and governance controls. SMART+ demonstrates risk mitigation, trust-building, and compliance readiness. By enabling responsible AI adoption and ensuring auditability, SMART+ provides a robust foundation for effective AI governance in clinical research.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 51 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Dec 2025.
Builds on
11 of 51 references.
References · 11
- 2019A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 1,911
- 2019Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, Taxonomies, Opportunities and Challenges toward Responsible AIcited by 1,543
- 2022Worldwide AI Ethics: a review of 200 guidelines and recommendations for AI governancecited by 28
- 2024On the Quest for Effectiveness in Human Oversight: Interdisciplinary Perspectivescited by 28
- 2025Formalising Human-in-the-Loop: Computational Reductions, Failure Modes, and Legal-Moral Responsibilitycited by 7
- 2023How to design an AI ethics boardcited by 6
- 2024AI Act and Large Language Models (LLMs): When critical issues and privacy impact require human and ethical oversightcited by 6
- 2024Human-In-The-Loop Machine Learning for Safe and Ethical Autonomous Vehicles: Principles, Challenges, and Opportunitiescited by 6
- 2025AI and Human Oversight: A Risk-Based Framework for Alignmentcited by 4
- 2024Towards An Automated AI Act FRIA Tool That Can Reuse GDPR's DPIAcited by 2
- 2025From Refusal to Recovery: A Control-Theoretic Approach to Generative AI Guardrailscited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.