IFFair: Influence Function-driven Sample Reweighting for Fair Classification
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Because machine learning has significantly improved efficiency and convenience in the society, it's increasingly used to assist or replace human decision-making. However, the data-based pattern makes related algorithms learn and even exacerbate potential bias in samples, resulting in discriminatory decisions against certain unprivileged groups, depriving them of the rights to equal treatment, thus damaging the social well-being and hindering the development of related applications. Therefore, we propose a pre-processing method IFFair based on the influence function. Compared with other fairness optimization approaches, IFFair only uses the influence disparity of training samples on different groups as a guidance to dynamically adjust the sample weights during training without modifying the network structure, data features and decision boundaries. To evaluate the validity of IFFair, we conduct experiments on multiple real-world datasets and metrics. The experimental results show that our approach mitigates bias of multiple accepted metrics in the classification setting, including demographic parity, equalized odds, equality of opportunity and error rate parity without conflicts. It also demonstrates that IFFair achieves better trade-off between multiple utility and fairness metrics compared with previous pre-processing methods.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 56 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Dec 2025.
Builds on
18 of 56 references.
References · 18
- 2019A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 1,911
- 2017Understanding Black-box Predictions via Influence Functionscited by 1,714
- 2019Class-Balanced Loss Based on Effective Number of Samplescited by 1,239
- 2014Certifying and removing disparate impactcited by 715
- 2017Men Also Like Shopping: Reducing Gender Bias Amplification using Corpus-level Constraintscited by 420
- 2018Learning Adversarially Fair and Transferable Representationscited by 353
- 2017Fairness in Criminal Justice Risk Assessments: The State of the Artcited by 315
- 2020Fairness without Demographics through Adversarially Reweighted Learningcited by 251
- 2018Examining Gender and Race Bias in Two Hundred Sentiment Analysis Systemscited by 234
- 2019Identifying and Correcting Label Bias in Machine Learningcited by 146
- 2019Fairness in Deep Learning: A Computational Perspectivecited by 123
- 2014Automated Experiments on Ad Privacy Settings: A Tale of Opacity, Choice, and Discriminationcited by 83
6 more
- 2019Conditional Learning of Fair Representationscited by 78
- 2016A Confidence-Based Approach for Balancing Fairness and Accuracycited by 73
- 2019Putting Fairness Principles into Practice: Challenges, Metrics, and Improvementscited by 70
- 2022Achieving Fairness at No Utility Cost via Data Reweighing with Influencecited by 38
- 2016Achieving non-discrimination in data releasecited by 23
- 2021Understanding Instance-based Interpretability of Variational Auto-Encoderscited by 21
Built on by
Not cited yet.