The Geometry of Persona: Disentangling Personality from Reasoning in Large Language Models
On the map: LLM reasoning → Reasoning benchmarks and evaluation
Abstract (arXiv)
Background: The deployment of personalized Large Language Models (LLMs) is currently constrained by the stability-plasticity dilemma. Prevailing alignment methods, such as Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT), rely on stochastic weight updates that often incur an "alignment tax" -- degrading general reasoning capabilities. Methods: We propose the Soul Engine, a framework based on the Linear Representation Hypothesis, which posits that personality traits exist as orthogonal linear subspaces. We introduce SoulBench, a dataset constructed via dynamic contextual sampling. Using a dual-head architecture on a frozen Qwen-2.5 base, we extract disentangled personality vectors without modifying the backbone weights. Results: Our experiments demonstrate three breakthroughs. First, High-Precision Profiling: The model achieves a Mean Squared Error (MSE) of 0.011 against psychological ground truth. Second, Geometric Orthogonality: T-SNE visualization confirms that personality manifolds are distinct and continuous, allowing for "Zero-Shot Personality Injection" that maintains original model intelligence. Third, Deterministic Steering: We achieve robust control over behavior via vector arithmetic, validated through extensive ablation studies. Conclusion: This work challenges the necessity of fine-tuning for personalization. By transitioning from probabilistic prompting to deterministic latent intervention, we provide a mathematically rigorous foundation for safe, controllable AI personalization.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Reasoning benchmarks and evaluation, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 10 of its 13 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Dec 2025.
Builds on
10 of 13 references.
References · 10
- 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
- 2016Overcoming catastrophic forgetting in neural networkscited by 4,718
- 2023Generative Agents: Interactive Simulacra of Human Behaviorcited by 3,500
- 2023Lost in the Middle: How Language Models Use Long Contextscited by 3,383
- 2023Qwen Technical Reportcited by 3,273
- 2023The Rise and Potential of Large Language Model Based Agents: A Surveycited by 1,422
- 2023Representation Engineering: A Top-Down Approach to AI Transparencycited by 1,239
- 2023Progress measures for grokking via mechanistic interpretabilitycited by 822
- 2023The Linear Representation Hypothesis and the Geometry of Large Language Modelscited by 679
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.
3 papers.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2024Personality Alignment of Large Language Models
- 2025Activation-Space Personality Steering: Hybrid Layer Selection for Stable Trait Control in LLMs
- 2026PTCBENCH: Benchmarking Contextual Stability of Personality Traits in LLM Systems
- 2024Is persona enough for personality? Using ChatGPT to reconstruct an agent's latent personality from simple descriptions
- 2025Evaluating LLM Alignment on Personality Inference from Real-World Interview Data
- 2026Controllable and explainable personality sliders for LLMs at inference time
- 2024P-React: Synthesizing Topic-Adaptive Reactions of Personality Traits via Mixture of Specialized LoRA Experts
- 2023PersonaLLM: Investigating the Ability of Large Language Models to Express Personality Traits