DEFEND: Poisoned Model Detection and Malicious Client Exclusion Mechanism for Secure Federated Learning-based Road Condition Classification
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Federated Learning (FL) has drawn the attention of the Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) community. FL can train various models for ITS tasks, notably camera-based Road Condition Classification (RCC), in a privacy-preserving collaborative way. However, opening up to collaboration also opens FL-based RCC systems to adversaries, i.e., misbehaving participants that can launch Targeted Label-Flipping Attacks (TLFAs) and threaten transportation safety. Adversaries mounting TLFAs poison training data to misguide model predictions, from an actual source class (e.g., wet road) to a wrongly perceived target class (e.g., dry road). Existing countermeasures against poisoning attacks cannot maintain model performance under TLFAs close to the performance level in attack-free scenarios, because they lack specific model misbehavior detection for TLFAs and neglect client exclusion after the detection. To close this research gap, we propose DEFEND, which includes a poisoned model detection strategy that leverages neuron-wise magnitude analysis for attack goal identification and Gaussian Mixture Model (GMM)-based clustering. DEFEND discards poisoned model contributions in each round and adapts accordingly client ratings, eventually excluding malicious clients. Extensive evaluation involving various FL-RCC models and tasks shows that DEFEND can thwart TLFAs and outperform seven baseline countermeasures, with at least 15.78% improvement, with DEFEND remarkably achieving under attack the same performance as in attack-free scenarios.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 43 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Dec 2025.
Builds on
13 of 43 references.
References · 13
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,592
- 2019EfficientNet: Rethinking Model Scaling for Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 6,415
- 2020Training data-efficient image transformers & distillation through attentioncited by 4,560
- 2018UMAP: Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection for Dimension Reductioncited by 2,841
- 2018Byzantine-Robust Distributed Learning: Towards Optimal Statistical Ratescited by 698
- 2020Data Poisoning Attacks Against Federated Learning Systemscited by 266
- 2022CrowdGuard: Federated Backdoor Detection in Federated Learningcited by 26
- 2023FreqFed: A Frequency Analysis-Based Approach for Mitigating Poisoning Attacks in Federated Learningcited by 25
- 2024BackdoorIndicator: Leveraging OOD Data for Proactive Backdoor Detection in Federated Learningcited by 17
- 2018Assessment of Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Road Surface Classificationcited by 13
- 2016The Key to Intelligent Transportation: Identity and Credential Management in Vehicular Communication Systemscited by 2
1 more
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.