mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Bridging quantum and classical computing for partial differential equations through multifidelity machine learning

arXiv 2512.05241 ↗First posted 4 Dec 2025cs.LG quant-phcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Quantum algorithms for partial differential equations (PDEs) face severe practical constraints on near-term hardware: limited qubit counts restrict spatial resolution to coarse grids, while circuit depth limitations prevent accurate long-time integration. These hardware bottlenecks confine quantum PDE solvers to low-fidelity regimes despite their theoretical potential for computational speedup. We introduce a multifidelity learning framework that corrects coarse quantum solutions to high-fidelity accuracy using sparse classical training data, facilitating the path toward practical quantum utility for scientific computing. The approach trains a low-fidelity surrogate on abundant quantum solver outputs, then learns correction mappings through a multifidelity neural architecture that balances linear and nonlinear transformations. Demonstrated on benchmark nonlinear PDEs including viscous Burgers equation and incompressible Navier-Stokes flows via quantum lattice Boltzmann methods, the framework successfully corrects coarse quantum predictions and achieves temporal extrapolation well beyond the classical training window. This strategy illustrates how one can reduce expensive high-fidelity simulation requirements while producing predictions that are competitive with classical accuracy. By bridging the gap between hardware-limited quantum simulations and application requirements, this work establishes a pathway for extracting computational value from current quantum devices in real-world scientific applications, advancing both algorithm development and practical deployment of near-term quantum computing for computational physics.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Dec 2025.

Builds on

15 of 35 references.

References · 15

  1. 2018Survey of multifidelity methods in uncertainty propagation, inference, and optimizationcited by 142
  2. 2024A comprehensive and FAIR comparison between MLP and KAN representations for differential equations and operator networkscited by 104
  3. 2022Multifidelity deep neural operators for efficient learning of partial differential equations with application to fast inverse design of nanoscale heat transportcited by 92
  4. 2020Transfer learning based multi-fidelity physics informed deep neural networkcited by 68
  5. 2020Multi-fidelity Bayesian Neural Networks: Algorithms and Applicationscited by 59
  6. 2022Multifidelity Deep Operator Networks For Data-Driven and Physics-Informed Problemscited by 58
  7. 2021Multi-fidelity regression using artificial neural networks: efficient approximation of parameter-dependent output quantitiescited by 31
  8. 2022Bi-fidelity Modeling of Uncertain and Partially Unknown Systems using DeepONetscited by 27
  9. 2020On transfer learning of neural networks using bi-fidelity data for uncertainty propagationcited by 26
  10. 2021Multifidelity Modeling for Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs)cited by 25
  11. 2023Stacked networks improve physics-informed training: applications to neural networks and deep operator networkscited by 21
  12. 2023A multifidelity approach to continual learning for physical systemscited by 13
3 more
  1. 2023A Multifidelity deep operator network approach to closure for multiscale systemscited by 11
  2. 2024Multifidelity Kolmogorov-Arnold Networkscited by 9
  3. 2023Feature-adjacent multi-fidelity physics-informed machine learning for partial differential equationscited by 8

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.