DEAR: Dataset for Evaluating the Aesthetics of Rendering
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Traditional Image Quality Assessment~(IQA) focuses on quantifying technical degradations such as noise, blur, or compression artifacts, using both full-reference and no-reference objective metrics. However, evaluation of rendering aesthetics, a growing domain relevant to photographic editing, content creation, and AI-generated imagery, remains underexplored due to the lack of datasets that reflect the inherently subjective nature of style preference. In this work, a novel benchmark dataset designed to model human aesthetic judgments of image rendering styles is introduced: the Dataset for Evaluating the Aesthetics of Rendering (DEAR). Built upon the MIT-Adobe FiveK dataset, DEAR incorporates pairwise human preference scores collected via large-scale crowdsourcing, with each image pair evaluated by 25 distinct human evaluators with a total of 13,648 of them participating overall. These annotations capture nuanced, context-sensitive aesthetic preferences, enabling the development and evaluation of models that go beyond traditional distortion-based IQA, focusing on a new task: Evaluation of Aesthetics of Rendering (EAR). The data collection pipeline is described, human voting patterns are analyzed, and multiple use cases are outlined, including style preference prediction, aesthetic benchmarking, and personalized aesthetic modeling. To the best of the authors' knowledge, DEAR is the first dataset to systematically address image aesthetics of rendering assessment grounded in subjective human preferences. A subset of 100 images with markup for them is published on HuggingFace (huggingface.co/datasets/vsevolodpl/DEAR).
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 49 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Dec 2025.
Builds on
17 of 49 references.
References · 17
- 2018The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Deep Features as a Perceptual Metriccited by 11,177
- 2022BLIP: Bootstrapping Language-Image Pre-training for Unified Vision-Language Understanding and Generationcited by 4,322
- 2021MUSIQ: Multi-scale Image Quality Transformercited by 1,081
- 2022Exploring CLIP for Assessing the Look and Feel of Imagescited by 991
- 2023Human Preference Score v2: A Solid Benchmark for Evaluating Human Preferences of Text-to-Image Synthesiscited by 890
- 2019KonIQ-10k: An ecologically valid database for deep learning of blind image quality assessmentcited by 355
- 2019From Patches to Pictures (PaQ-2-PiQ): Mapping the Perceptual Space of Picture Qualitycited by 223
- 2023AGIQA-3K: An Open Database for AI-Generated Image Quality Assessmentcited by 142
- 2023Re-IQA: Unsupervised Learning for Image Quality Assessment in the Wildcited by 97
- 2021Image Quality Assessment using Contrastive Learningcited by 95
- 2023ARNIQA: Learning Distortion Manifold for Image Quality Assessmentcited by 89
- 2016On the Use of Deep Learning for Blind Image Quality Assessmentcited by 34
5 more
- 2024AIGIQA-20K: A Large Database for AI-Generated Image Quality Assessmentcited by 33
- 2024Quality-Aware Image-Text Alignment for Opinion-Unaware Image Quality Assessmentcited by 32
- 2020DeepFL-IQA: Weak Supervision for Deep IQA Feature Learningcited by 29
- 2024UHD-IQA Benchmark Database: Pushing the Boundaries of Blind Photo Quality Assessmentcited by 16
- 2024LAR-IQA: A Lightweight, Accurate, and Robust No-Reference Image Quality Assessment Modelcited by 5
Built on by
Not cited yet.