mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Provably tuning the ElasticNet across instances

arXiv 2207.10199 ↗First posted 20 Jul 2022cs.LG stat.MLcited by 14

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

An important unresolved challenge in the theory of regularization is to set the regularization coefficients of popular techniques like the ElasticNet with general provable guarantees. We consider the problem of tuning the regularization parameters of Ridge regression, LASSO, and the ElasticNet across multiple problem instances, a setting that encompasses both cross-validation and multi-task hyperparameter optimization. We obtain a novel structural result for the ElasticNet which characterizes the loss as a function of the tuning parameters as a piecewise-rational function with algebraic boundaries. We use this to bound the structural complexity of the regularized loss functions and show generalization guarantees for tuning the ElasticNet regression coefficients in the statistical setting. We also consider the more challenging online learning setting, where we show vanishing average expected regret relative to the optimal parameter pair. We further extend our results to tuning classification algorithms obtained by thresholding regression fits regularized by Ridge, LASSO, or ElasticNet. Our results are the first general learning-theoretic guarantees for this important class of problems that avoid strong assumptions on the data distribution. Furthermore, our guarantees hold for both validation and popular information criterion objectives.

Key facts. Cited by 14 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 65 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Jul 2022.

Builds on

13 of 65 references.

References · 13

  1. 2017A Survey on Multi-Task Learningcited by 840
  2. 2019Surprises in High-Dimensional Ridgeless Least Squares Interpolationcited by 513
  3. 2015High-Dimensional Asymptotics of Prediction: Ridge Regression and Classificationcited by 148
  4. 2015A PAC Approach to Application-Specific Algorithm Selectioncited by 58
  5. 2017Dispersion for Data-Driven Algorithm Design, Online Learning, and Private Optimizationcited by 37
  6. 2021Sample Complexity of Tree Search Configuration: Cutting Planes and Beyondcited by 33
  7. 2019How much data is sufficient to learn high-performing algorithms? Generalization guarantees for data-driven algorithm designcited by 27
  8. 2016Sample Complexity of Automated Mechanism Designcited by 24
  9. 2021Learning-to-learn non-convex piecewise-Lipschitz functionscited by 15
  10. 2019Semi-bandit Optimization in the Dispersed Settingcited by 14
  11. 2019Learning to Linkcited by 14
  12. 2021Data driven semi-supervised learningcited by 14
1 more
  1. 2014Don't Fall for Tuning Parameters: Tuning-Free Variable Selection in High Dimensions With the TREXcited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 3; 2024: 3; 2025: 6; 2026: 2.

14 papers.

Sort:

By area: