Breast Cell Segmentation Under Extreme Data Constraints: Quantum Enhancement Meets Adaptive Loss Stabilization
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Annotating medical images demands significant time and expertise, often requiring pathologists to invest hundreds of hours in labeling mammary epithelial nuclei datasets. We address this critical challenge by achieving 95.5% Dice score using just 599 training images for breast cell segmentation, where just 4% of pixels represent breast tissue and 60% of images contain no breast regions. Our framework uses quantum-inspired edge enhancement via multi-scale Gabor filters creating a fourth input channel, enhancing boundary detection where inter-annotator variations reach +/- 3 pixels. We present a stabilized multi-component loss function that integrates adaptive Dice loss with boundary-aware terms and automatic positive weighting to effectively address severe class imbalance, where mammary epithelial cell regions comprise only 0.1%-20% of the total image area. Additionally, a complexity-based weighted sampling strategy is introduced to prioritize the challenging mammary epithelial cell regions. The model employs an EfficientNet-B7/UNet++ architecture with a 4-to-3 channel projection, enabling the use of pretrained weights despite limited medical imaging data. Finally, robust validation is achieved through exponential moving averaging and statistical outlier detection, ensuring reliable performance estimates on a small validation set (129 images). Our framework achieves a Dice score of 95.5% +/- 0.3% and an IoU of 91.2% +/- 0.4%. Notably, quantum-based enhancement contributes to a 2.1% improvement in boundary accuracy, while weighted sampling increases small lesion detection by 3.8%. By achieving groundbreaking performance with limited annotations, our approach significantly reduces the medical expert time required for dataset creation, addressing a fundamental bottleneck in clinical perception AI development.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 43 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Dec 2025.
Builds on
21 of 43 references.
References · 21
- 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,604
- 2015Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shiftcited by 6,979
- 2019EfficientNet: Rethinking Model Scaling for Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 6,415
- 2017Squeeze-and-Excitation Networkscited by 4,763
- 2018Encoder-Decoder with Atrous Separable Convolution for Semantic Image Segmentationcited by 3,210
- 2016V-Net: Fully Convolutional Neural Networks for Volumetric Medical Image Segmentationcited by 2,284
- 2021TransUNet: Transformers Make Strong Encoders for Medical Image Segmentationcited by 1,552
- 2018UNet++: A Nested U-Net Architecture for Medical Image Segmentationcited by 1,518
- 2018Attention U-Net: Learning Where to Look for the Pancreascited by 1,420
- 2021Swin-Unet: Unet-like Pure Transformer for Medical Image Segmentationcited by 1,218
- 2017A Survey on Deep Learning in Medical Image Analysiscited by 1,182
- 2021UNETR: Transformers for 3D Medical Image Segmentationcited by 954
9 more
- 2020Image Segmentation Using Deep Learning: A Surveycited by 659
- 2017Generalised Dice overlap as a deep learning loss function for highly unbalanced segmentationscited by 614
- 2021High-Performance Large-Scale Image Recognition Without Normalizationcited by 359
- 2017Tversky loss function for image segmentation using 3D fully convolutional deep networkscited by 228
- 2018A Novel Focal Tversky loss function with improved Attention U-Net for lesion segmentationcited by 171
- 2018Concurrent Spatial and Channel Squeeze & Excitation in Fully Convolutional Networkscited by 120
- 2020DC-UNet: Rethinking the U-Net Architecture with Dual Channel Efficient CNN for Medical Images Segmentationcited by 28
- 2022Semantic Segmentation with Active Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 16
- 2024Quantum-enhanced unsupervised image segmentation for medical images analysiscited by 3
Built on by
Not cited yet.