mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Factor(T,U): Factored Cognition Strengthens Monitoring of Untrusted AI

arXiv 2512.02157 ↗First posted 1 Dec 2025cs.CR cs.CLcited by 4

On the map: LLM safety and security → Prompt injection and agent security

Abstract (arXiv)

The field of AI Control seeks to develop robust control protocols, deployment safeguards for untrusted AI which may be intentionally subversive. However, existing protocols that rely on weaker monitors to detect unsafe behavior often fail on complex tasks beyond the monitor's comprehension. We develop control protocols based on factored cognition, in which a trusted model decomposes a task, an untrusted model solves each resultant child task in isolation, and the results are reassembled into a full solution. These protocols may improve safety by several means, such as by simplifying the context for monitors, or by obscuring vulnerabilities in the environment. We implement our protocols in the APPS coding setting and red team them against backdoor attempts from an adversarial GPT-4.1 Nano. We find that: (i) Adding factored cognition to a trusted monitoring protocol can boost safety from 41% to 63%; (ii) Safety improves because monitor performance improves; (iii) Factored cognition makes it no harder for capable LLMs to write backdoors in APPS. While our protocols show low usefulness in APPS, they hold promise for more complex tasks.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Prompt injection and agent security, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security. Builds on 1 of its 12 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Dec 2025.

Builds on

1 of 12 references.

References · 1

  1. 2025Control Tax: The Price of Keeping AI in Checkcited by 7

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 4.

4 papers.