Benchmarking Overton Pluralism in LLMs
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We introduce OVERTONBENCH, a novel framework for measuring Overton pluralism in LLMs--the extent to which diverse viewpoints are represented in model outputs. We (i) formalize Overton pluralism as a set coverage metric (OVERTONSCORE), (ii) conduct a large-scale U.S.-representative human study (N = 1208; 60 questions; 8 LLMs), and (iii) develop an automated benchmark that closely reproduces human judgments. On average, models achieve OVERTONSCOREs of 0.35--0.41, with DeepSeek V3 performing best; yet all models remain far below the theoretical maximum of 1.0, revealing substantial headroom for improvement. Because repeated large-scale human studies are costly and slow, scalable evaluation tools are essential for model development. Hence, we propose an automated benchmark that achieves high rank correlation with human judgments (ρ = 0.88), providing a practical proxy without replacing human assessment. By turning pluralistic alignment from a normative aim into a measurable benchmark, our work establishes a foundation for systematic progress toward more pluralistic LLMs.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 29 of its 43 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Dec 2025.
Builds on
29 of 43 references.
References · 29
- 2023Whose Opinions Do Language Models Reflect?cited by 759
- 2023Open Problems and Fundamental Limitations of Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 743
- 2022Out of One, Many: Using Language Models to Simulate Human Samplescited by 737
- 2020Artificial Intelligence, Values and Alignmentcited by 443
- 2023Towards Measuring the Representation of Subjective Global Opinions in Language Modelscited by 424
- 2023A Survey of Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 259
- 2023From Pretraining Data to Language Models to Downstream Tasks: Tracking the Trails of Political Biases Leading to Unfair NLP Modelscited by 257
- 2022Fine-tuning language models to find agreement among humans with diverse preferencescited by 189
- 2024Political Compass or Spinning Arrow? Towards More Meaningful Evaluations for Values and Opinions in Large Language Modelscited by 162
- 2024Investigating Cultural Alignment of Large Language Modelscited by 140
- 2024The PRISM Alignment Dataset: What Participatory, Representative and Individualised Human Feedback Reveals About the Subjective and Multicultural Alignment of Large Language Modelscited by 136
- 2024MaxMin-RLHF: Alignment with Diverse Human Preferencescited by 121
17 more
- 2024Collective Constitutional AI: Aligning a Language Model with Public Inputcited by 120
- 2024Modular Pluralism: Pluralistic Alignment via Multi-LLM Collaborationcited by 111
- 2020Participation is not a Design Fix for Machine Learningcited by 110
- 2021Algorithmic Monoculture and Social Welfarecited by 98
- 2023Value Kaleidoscope: Engaging AI with Pluralistic Human Values, Rights, and Dutiescited by 97
- 2022Picking on the Same Person: Does Algorithmic Monoculture lead to Outcome Homogenization?cited by 89
- 2024Hidden Persuaders: LLMs' Political Leaning and Their Influence on Voterscited by 71
- 2024Unintended Impacts of LLM Alignment on Global Representationcited by 66
- 2023Not All Countries Celebrate Thanksgiving: On the Cultural Dominance in Large Language Modelscited by 42
- 2023Opportunities and Risks of LLMs for Scalable Deliberation with Poliscited by 41
- 2024From Distributional to Overton Pluralism: Investigating Large Language Model Alignmentcited by 33
- 2024On the Relationship between Truth and Political Bias in Language Modelscited by 31
- 2025Value Profiles for Encoding Human Variationcited by 29
- 2023Moral Machine or Tyranny of the Majority?cited by 22
- 2024Beyond Behaviorist Representational Harms: A Plan for Measurement and Mitigationcited by 17
- 2025VITAL: A New Dataset for Benchmarking Pluralistic Alignment in Healthcarecited by 17
- 2024Beyond Partisan Leaning: A Comparative Analysis of Political Bias in Large Language Modelscited by 13
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 7.
7 papers.
- 2026AI Alignment Breaks at the Edgecited by 3
- 2026Persona Generators: Generating Diverse Synthetic Personas for Arbitrary Contextscited by 2
- 2026What Does the AI Doctor Value? Auditing Pluralism in the Clinical Ethics of Language Modelscited by 2
- 2026Can LLMs Think Like Consumers? Benchmarking Crowd-Level Reaction Reconstruction with ConsumerSimBenchcited by 1
- 2026AI Alignment From Social Choice Perspectivescited by 0
- 2026A Roadmap to Impactful Pluralistic Alignment Researchcited by 0
- 2026Where Models Converge and Humans Diverge: A Coverage Framework for Distributional Pluralism in Open-Ended Generationcited by 0
- 2026Where Models Converge and Humans Diverge: A Coverage Framework for Distributional Pluralism in Open-Ended Generation6 Aug 2026
- 2026A Roadmap to Impactful Pluralistic Alignment Research24 Jul 2026
- 2026AI Alignment From Social Choice Perspectives19 Jun 2026
- 2026What Does the AI Doctor Value? Auditing Pluralism in the Clinical Ethics of Language Models18 May 2026
- 2026Can LLMs Think Like Consumers? Benchmarking Crowd-Level Reaction Reconstruction with ConsumerSimBench16 May 2026
- 2026AI Alignment Breaks at the Edge23 Feb 2026
- 2026Persona Generators: Generating Diverse Synthetic Personas for Arbitrary Contexts3 Feb 2026