mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Infinitely divisible privacy and beyond I: resolution of the s2=2k conjecture

arXiv 2512.00734 ↗First posted 30 Nov 2025math.ST cs.CR cs.ITcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Differential privacy is increasingly formalized through the lens of hypothesis testing via the robust and interpretable f-DP framework, where privacy guarantees are encoded by a baseline Blackwell trade-off function f∞ = T(P∞, Q∞) involving a pair of distributions (P∞, Q∞). The problem of choosing the right privacy metric in practice leads to a central question: what is a statistically appropriate baseline f∞ given some prior modeling assumptions? The special case of Gaussian differential privacy (GDP) showed that, under compositions of nearly perfect mechanisms, these trade-off functions exhibit a central limit behavior with a Gaussian limit experiment. Inspired by Le Cam's theory of limits of statistical experiments, we answer this question in full generality in an infinitely divisible setting. We show that suitable composition experiments (Pnotimes n, Qnotimes n) converge to a binary limit experiment (P∞, Q∞) whose log-likelihood ratio L = log(dQ∞ / dP∞) is infinitely divisible under P∞. Thus any limiting trade-off function f∞ is determined by an infinitely divisible law P∞, characterized by its Levy--Khintchine triplet, and its Esscher tilt defined by dQ∞(x) = ex dP∞(x). This characterizes all limiting baseline trade-off functions f∞ arising from compositions of nearly perfect differentially private mechanisms. Our framework recovers GDP as the purely Gaussian case and yields explicit non-Gaussian limits, including Poisson examples. It also positively resolves the empirical s2 = 2k phenomenon observed in the GDP paper and provides an optimal mechanism for count statistics achieving asymmetric Poisson differential privacy.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 53 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Nov 2025.

Builds on

11 of 53 references.

References · 11

  1. 2016Deep Learning with Differential Privacycited by 2,682
  2. 2016Concentrated Differential Privacy: Simplifications, Extensions, and Lower Boundscited by 339
  3. 2013The Composition Theorem for Differential Privacycited by 290
  4. 2018Subsampled R'enyi Differential Privacy and Analytical Moments Accountantcited by 234
  5. 2016Concentrated Differential Privacycited by 139
  6. 2020The Discrete Gaussian for Differential Privacycited by 134
  7. 2021The Skellam Mechanism for Differentially Private Federated Learningcited by 66
  8. 2024A Statistical Framework of Watermarks for Large Language Models: Pivot, Detection Efficiency and Optimal Rulescited by 53
  9. 2023Advancing Differential Privacy: Where We Are Now and Future Directions for Real-World Deploymentcited by 26
  10. 2021Canonical Noise Distributions and Private Hypothesis Testscited by 8
  11. 2025Gaussian Certified Unlearning in High Dimensions: A Hypothesis Testing Approachcited by 5

Built on by

Not cited yet.