mlsanityData to 13 Oct 2026

SafeCiM: Investigating Resilience of Hybrid Floating-Point Compute-in-Memory Deep Learning Accelerators

arXiv 2512.00059 ↗First posted 23 Nov 2025cs.AR cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) continue to grow in complexity with Large Language Models (LLMs) incorporating vast numbers of parameters. Handling these parameters efficiently in traditional accelerators is limited by data-transmission bottlenecks, motivating Compute-in-Memory (CiM) architectures that integrate computation within or near memory to reduce data movement. Recent work has explored CiM designs using Floating-Point (FP) and Integer (INT) operations. FP computations typically deliver higher output quality due to their wider dynamic range and precision, benefiting precision-sensitive Generative AI applications. These include models such as LLMs, thus driving advancements in FP-CiM accelerators. However, the vulnerability of FP-CiM to hardware faults remains underexplored, posing a major reliability concern in mission-critical settings. To address this gap, we systematically analyze hardware fault effects in FP-CiM by introducing bit-flip faults at key computational stages, including digital multipliers, CiM memory cells, and digital adder trees. Experiments with Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) such as AlexNet and state-of-the-art LLMs including LLaMA-3.2-1B and Qwen-0.3B-Base reveal how faults at each stage affect inference accuracy. Notably, a single adder fault can reduce LLM accuracy to 0%. Based on these insights, we propose a fault-resilient design, SafeCiM, that mitigates fault impact far better than a naive FP-CiM with a pre-alignment stage. For example, with 4096 MAC units, SafeCiM reduces accuracy degradation by up to 49x for a single adder fault compared to the baseline FP-CiM architecture.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 13 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 63 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Nov 2025.

Builds on

12 of 63 references.

References · 12

  1. 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,486
  2. 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,876
  3. 2021Silent Data Corruptions at Scalecited by 23
  4. 2023A Systematic Literature Review on Hardware Reliability Assessment Methods for Deep Neural Networkscited by 23
  5. 2023From Generative AI to Generative Internet of Things: Fundamentals, Framework, and Outlookscited by 16
  6. 2024The Landscape of Compute-near-memory and Compute-in-memory: A Research and Commercial Overviewcited by 8
  7. 2021SIAM: Chiplet-based Scalable In-Memory Acceleration with Mesh for Deep Neural Networkscited by 6
  8. 2021Quantization of Generative Adversarial Networks for Efficient Inference: a Methodological Studycited by 4
  9. 2024AFPR-CIM: An Analog-Domain Floating-Point RRAM-based Compute-In-Memory Architecture with Dynamic Range Adaptive FP-ADCcited by 3
  10. 2024Low-Bitwidth Floating Point Quantization for Efficient High-Quality Diffusion Modelscited by 3
  11. 2023NeuralFuse: Learning to Recover the Accuracy of Access-Limited Neural Network Inference in Low-Voltage Regimescited by 2
  12. 2023ISimDL: Importance Sampling-Driven Acceleration of Fault Injection Simulations for Evaluating the Robustness of Deep Learningcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.