ISimDL: Importance Sampling-Driven Acceleration of Fault Injection Simulations for Evaluating the Robustness of Deep Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Deep Learning (DL) systems have proliferated in many applications, requiring specialized hardware accelerators and chips. In the nano-era, devices have become increasingly more susceptible to permanent and transient faults. Therefore, we need an efficient methodology for analyzing the resilience of advanced DL systems against such faults, and understand how the faults in neural accelerator chips manifest as errors at the DL application level, where faults can lead to undetectable and unrecoverable errors. Using fault injection, we can perform resilience investigations of the DL system by modifying neuron weights and outputs at the software-level, as if the hardware had been affected by a transient fault. Existing fault models reduce the search space, allowing faster analysis, but requiring a-priori knowledge on the model, and not allowing further analysis of the filtered-out search space. Therefore, we propose ISimDL, a novel methodology that employs neuron sensitivity to generate importance sampling-based fault-scenarios. Without any a-priori knowledge of the model-under-test, ISimDL provides an equivalent reduction of the search space as existing works, while allowing long simulations to cover all the possible faults, improving on existing model requirements. Our experiments show that the importance sampling provides up to 15x higher precision in selecting critical faults than the random uniform sampling, reaching such precision in less than 100 faults. Additionally, we showcase another practical use-case for importance sampling for reliable DNN design, namely Fault Aware Training (FAT). By using ISimDL to select the faults leading to errors, we can insert the faults during the DNN training process to harden the DNN against such faults. Using importance sampling in FAT reduces the overhead required for finding faults that lead to a predetermined drop in accuracy by more than 12x.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Mar 2023.
Builds on
13 of 36 references.
References · 13
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
- 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
- 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,267
- 2017Fashion-MNIST: a Novel Image Dataset for Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithmscited by 4,283
- 2020Captum: A unified and generic model interpretability library for PyTorchcited by 542
- 2018How Important Is a Neuron?cited by 73
- 2021Compute and Energy Consumption Trends in Deep Learning Inferencecited by 61
- 2020A Framework For Contrastive Self-Supervised Learning And Designing A New Approachcited by 51
- 2018Computationally Efficient Measures of Internal Neuron Importancecited by 19
- 2019ML-based Fault Injection for Autonomous Vehicles: A Case for Bayesian Fault Injectioncited by 16
- 2019Summarizing CPU and GPU Design Trends with Product Datacited by 10
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.
1 paper.