mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Extracting Disaster Impacts and Impact Related Locations in Social Media Posts Using Large Language Models

arXiv 2511.21753 ↗First posted 24 Nov 2025cs.CL cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Large-scale disasters can often result in catastrophic consequences on people and infrastructure. Situation awareness about such disaster impacts generated by authoritative data from in-situ sensors, remote sensing imagery, and/or geographic data is often limited due to atmospheric opacity, satellite revisits, and time limitations. This often results in geo-temporal information gaps. In contrast, impact-related social media posts can act as "geo-sensors" during a disaster, where people describe specific impacts and locations. However, not all locations mentioned in disaster-related social media posts relate to an impact. Only the impacted locations are critical for directing resources effectively. e.g., "The death toll from a fire which ripped through the Greek coastal town of #Mati stood at 80, with dozens of people unaccounted for as forensic experts tried to identify victims who were burned alive #Greecefires #AthensFires #Athens #Greece." contains impacted location "Mati" and non-impacted locations "Greece" and "Athens". This research uses Large Language Models (LLMs) to identify all locations, impacts and impacted locations mentioned in disaster-related social media posts. In the process, LLMs are fine-tuned to identify only impacts and impacted locations (as distinct from other, non-impacted locations), including locations mentioned in informal expressions, abbreviations, and short forms. Our fine-tuned model demonstrates efficacy, achieving an F1-score of 0.69 for impact and 0.74 for impacted location extraction, substantially outperforming the pre-trained baseline. These robust results confirm the potential of fine-tuned language models to offer a scalable solution for timely decision-making in resource allocation, situational awareness, and post-disaster recovery planning for responders.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 37 of its 105 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Nov 2025.

Builds on

37 of 105 references.

References · 37

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  2. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  3. 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,302
  4. 2019Unsupervised Cross-lingual Representation Learning at Scalecited by 3,907
  5. 2022Emergent Abilities of Large Language Modelscited by 2,483
  6. 2021Pre-train, Prompt, and Predict: A Systematic Survey of Prompting Methods in Natural Language Processingcited by 2,222
  7. 2022Survey of Hallucination in Natural Language Generationcited by 2,056
  8. 2023A Survey on Hallucination in Large Language Models: Principles, Taxonomy, Challenges, and Open Questionscited by 1,582
  9. 2021Calibrate Before Use: Improving Few-Shot Performance of Language Modelscited by 1,371
  10. 2020It's Not Just Size That Matters: Small Language Models Are Also Few-Shot Learnerscited by 668
  11. 2016Neural Architectures for Named Entity Recognitioncited by 548
  12. 2023A Survey of Hallucination in Large Foundation Modelscited by 365
25 more
  1. 2023Chain-of-Verification Reduces Hallucination in Large Language Modelscited by 317
  2. 2025Why Language Models Hallucinatecited by 205
  3. 2023Large Language Models for Generative Information Extraction: A Surveycited by 183
  4. 2023GPT-NER: Named Entity Recognition via Large Language Modelscited by 158
  5. 2023GLiNER: Generalist Model for Named Entity Recognition using Bidirectional Transformercited by 84
  6. 2014Processing Social Media Messages in Mass Emergency: A Surveycited by 50
  7. 2016Twitter as a Lifeline: Human-annotated Twitter Corpora for NLP of Crisis-related Messagescited by 43
  8. 2021HumAID: Human-Annotated Disaster Incidents Data from Twitter with Deep Learning Benchmarkscited by 38
  9. 2023PromptNER: Prompting For Named Entity Recognitioncited by 35
  10. 2019Calibration, Entropy Rates, and Memory in Language Modelscited by 32
  11. 2023Geo-knowledge-guided GPT models improve the extraction of location descriptions from disaster-related social media messagescited by 31
  12. 2020CrisisBERT: a Robust Transformer for Crisis Classification and Contextual Crisis Embeddingcited by 25
  13. 2019Location reference identification from tweets during emergencies: A deep learning approachcited by 14
  14. 2018A Twitter Tale of Three Hurricanes: Harvey, Irma, and Mariacited by 12
  15. 2021TBCOV: Two Billion Multilingual COVID-19 Tweets with Sentiment, Entity, Geo, and Gender Labelscited by 11
  16. 2024Evaluating Robustness of LLMs on Crisis-Related Microblogs across Events, Information Types, and Linguistic Featurescited by 7
  17. 2025Do LLMs Surpass Encoders for Biomedical NER?cited by 6
  18. 2018SAVITR: A System for Real-time Location Extraction from Microblogs during Emergenciescited by 4
  19. 2020Social Media Information Sharing for Natural Disaster Responsecited by 3
  20. 2024Monitoring Critical Infrastructure Facilities During Disasters Using Large Language Modelscited by 3
  21. 2013Major Limitations of Satellite imagescited by 2
  22. 2024LLM-DER:A Named Entity Recognition Method Based on Large Language Models for Chinese Coal Chemical Domaincited by 2
  23. 2024Zero-Shot Classification of Crisis Tweets Using Instruction-Finetuned Large Language Modelscited by 2
  24. 2024Comparative Performance of Advanced NLP Models and LLMs in Multilingual Geo-Entity Detectioncited by 2
  25. 2021Identification of Fine-Grained Location Mentions in Crisis Tweetscited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.