mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Anomaly Detection with Adaptive and Aggressive Rejection for Contaminated Training Data

arXiv 2511.21378 ↗First posted 26 Nov 2025cs.LG cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Handling contaminated data poses a critical challenge in anomaly detection, as traditional models assume training on purely normal data. Conventional methods mitigate contamination by relying on fixed contamination ratios, but discrepancies between assumed and actual ratios can severely degrade performance, especially in noisy environments where normal and abnormal data distributions overlap. To address these limitations, we propose Adaptive and Aggressive Rejection (AAR), a novel method that dynamically excludes anomalies using a modified z-score and Gaussian mixture model-based thresholds. AAR effectively balances the trade-off between preserving normal data and excluding anomalies by integrating hard and soft rejection strategies. Extensive experiments on two image datasets and thirty tabular datasets demonstrate that AAR outperforms the state-of-the-art method by 0.041 AUROC. By providing a scalable and reliable solution, AAR enhances robustness against contaminated datasets, paving the way for broader real-world applications in domains such as security and healthcare.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 60 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Nov 2025.

Builds on

26 of 60 references.

References · 26

  1. 2015Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shiftcited by 7,005
  2. 2017Fashion-MNIST: a Novel Image Dataset for Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithmscited by 4,349
  3. 2018Co-teaching: Robust Training of Deep Neural Networks with Extremely Noisy Labelscited by 1,059
  4. 2018Generalized Cross Entropy Loss for Training Deep Neural Networks with Noisy Labelscited by 997
  5. 2018Deep Anomaly Detection with Outlier Exposurecited by 942
  6. 2020DivideMix: Learning with Noisy Labels as Semi-supervised Learningcited by 692
  7. 2017MentorNet: Learning Data-Driven Curriculum for Very Deep Neural Networks on Corrupted Labelscited by 653
  8. 2019Memorizing Normality to Detect Anomaly: Memory-augmented Deep Autoencoder for Unsupervised Anomaly Detectioncited by 564
  9. 2015Empirical Evaluation of Rectified Activations in Convolutional Networkcited by 519
  10. 2020CSI: Novelty Detection via Contrastive Learning on Distributionally Shifted Instancescited by 441
  11. 2015Adversarial Autoencoderscited by 364
  12. 2019Unsupervised Label Noise Modeling and Loss Correctioncited by 328
14 more
  1. 2019Deep Semi-Supervised Anomaly Detectioncited by 291
  2. 2018Improving Unsupervised Defect Segmentation by Applying Structural Similarity to Autoencoderscited by 264
  3. 2020Identifying Mislabeled Data using the Area Under the Margin Rankingcited by 261
  4. 2020Explainable Deep One-Class Classificationcited by 127
  5. 2020Deep Learning for Medical Anomaly Detection -- A Surveycited by 127
  6. 2021Mean-Shifted Contrastive Loss for Anomaly Detectioncited by 88
  7. 2021Generalized Jensen-Shannon Divergence Loss for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 74
  8. 2022Latent Outlier Exposure for Anomaly Detection with Contaminated Datacited by 48
  9. 2021LongReMix: Robust Learning with High Confidence Samples in a Noisy Label Environmentcited by 40
  10. 2019Robust Anomaly Detection in Images using Adversarial Autoencoderscited by 38
  11. 2022Estimating the Contamination Factor's Distribution in Unsupervised Anomaly Detectioncited by 14
  12. 2020Towards a More Reliable Interpretation of Machine Learning Outputs for Safety-Critical Systems using Feature Importance Fusioncited by 11
  13. 2021Normality-Calibrated Autoencoder for Unsupervised Anomaly Detection on Data Contaminationcited by 5
  14. 2023An Iterative Method for Unsupervised Robust Anomaly Detection Under Data Contaminationcited by 4

Built on by

Not cited yet.