mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

LOOM: Personalized Learning Informed by Daily LLM Conversations Toward Long-Term Mastery via a Dynamic Learner Memory Graph

arXiv 2511.21037 ↗First posted 26 Nov 2025cs.HCcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Foundation models are increasingly used to personalize learning, yet many systems still assume fixed curricula or coarse progress signals, limiting alignment with learners' day-to-day needs. At the other extreme, lightweight incidental systems offer flexible, in-the-moment content but rarely guide learners toward mastery. Prior work privileges either continuity (maintaining a plan across sessions) or initiative (reacting to the moment), not both, leaving learners to navigate the trade-off between recency and trajectory-immediate relevance versus cumulative, goal-aligned progress. We present LOOM, an agentic pipeline that infers evolving learner needs from recent LLM conversations and a dynamic learner memory graph, then assembles coherent learning materials personalized to the learner's current needs, priorities, and understanding. These materials link adjacent concepts and surface gaps as tightly scoped modules that cumulatively advance broader goals, providing guidance and sustained progress while remaining responsive to new interests. We describe LOOM's end-to-end architecture and working prototype, including conversation summarization, topic planning, course generation, and graph-based progress tracking. In a formative study with ten participants, users reported that LOOM's generated lessons felt relevant to their recent activities and helped them recognize knowledge gaps, though they also highlighted needs for greater consistency and control. We conclude with design implications for more robust, mixed-initiative learning pipelines that integrate structured learner modelling with everyday LLM interactions.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 26 Nov 2025.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Simulating Human-Like Learning Dynamics with LLM-Empowered Agents
  2. 2025IntelliCode: A Multi-Agent LLM Tutoring System with Centralized Learner Modeling
  3. 2026AgentBrew: Lifelong Knowledge Brewing from Strong Teachers to Weak LLM Agents
  4. 2026EduClaw-Bench: A Long-Horizon Benchmark for Pedagogical LLM Agents with Simulated Learners
  5. 2025Dialogic Pedagogy for Large Language Models: Aligning Conversational AI with Proven Theories of Learning
  6. 2025Fine-tuning with RAG for Improving LLM Learning of New Skills
  7. 2026Optimizing LLM Annotation of Classroom Discourse through Multi-Agent Orchestration
  8. 2026DeepTutor: Towards Agentic Personalized Tutoring