mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

A Physics-Informed Loss Function for Boundary-Consistent and Robust Artery Segmentation in DSA Sequences

arXiv 2511.20501 ↗First posted 25 Nov 2025cs.CV cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Accurate extraction and segmentation of the cerebral arteries from digital subtraction angiography (DSA) sequences is essential for developing reliable clinical management models of complex cerebrovascular diseases. Conventional loss functions often rely solely on pixel-wise overlap, overlooking the geometric and physical consistency of vascular boundaries, which can lead to fragmented or unstable vessel predictions. To overcome this limitation, we propose a novel textitPhysics-Informed Loss (PIL) that models the interaction between the predicted and ground-truth boundaries as an elastic process inspired by dislocation theory in materials physics. This formulation introduces a physics-based regularization term that enforces smooth contour evolution and structural consistency, allowing the network to better capture fine vascular geometry. The proposed loss is integrated into several segmentation architectures, including U-Net, U-Net++, SegFormer, and MedFormer, and evaluated on two public benchmarks: DIAS and DSCA. Experimental results demonstrate that PIL consistently outperforms conventional loss functions such as Cross-Entropy, Dice, Active Contour, and Surface losses, achieving superior sensitivity, F1 score, and boundary coherence. These findings confirm that the incorporation of physics-based boundary interactions into deep neural networks improves both the precision and robustness of vascular segmentation in dynamic angiographic imaging. The implementation of the proposed method is publicly available at https://github.com/irfantahir301/Physicsisloss.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 18 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Nov 2025.

Builds on

14 of 18 references.

References · 14

  1. 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,604
  2. 2021SegFormer: Simple and Efficient Design for Semantic Segmentation with Transformerscited by 2,923
  3. 2018UNet++: A Nested U-Net Architecture for Medical Image Segmentationcited by 1,518
  4. 2018Attention U-Net: Learning Where to Look for the Pancreascited by 1,420
  5. 2021Medical Transformer: Gated Axial-Attention for Medical Image Segmentationcited by 319
  6. 2020A review of deep learning in medical imaging: Imaging traits, technology trends, case studies with progress highlights, and future promisescited by 230
  7. 2019Topology-Preserving Deep Image Segmentationcited by 198
  8. 2018Boundary loss for highly unbalanced segmentationcited by 187
  9. 2017Beyond the Pixel-Wise Loss for Topology-Aware Delineationcited by 82
  10. 2018DeepVesselNet: Vessel Segmentation, Centerline Prediction, and Bifurcation Detection in 3-D Angiographic Volumescited by 62
  11. 2021TransAttUnet: Multi-level Attention-guided U-Net with Transformer for Medical Image Segmentationcited by 60
  12. 2020Post-DAE: Anatomically Plausible Segmentation via Post-Processing with Denoising Autoencoderscited by 38
2 more
  1. 2023DIAS: A Dataset and Benchmark for Intracranial Artery Segmentation in DSA sequencescited by 10
  2. 2024DSCA: A Digital Subtraction Angiography Sequence Dataset and Spatio-Temporal Model for Cerebral Artery Segmentationcited by 8

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.