Path-Constrained Retrieval: A Structural Approach to Reliable LLM Agent Reasoning Through Graph-Scoped Semantic Search
On the map: LLM reasoning → Knowledge- and tool-augmented reasoning
also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)
Large Language Model agents often retrieve context from knowledge bases that lack structural consistency with the agent's current reasoning state, leading to incoherent reasoning chains. We introduce Path-Constrained Retrieval (PCR), a retrieval method that combines structural graph constraints with semantic search to ensure retrieved information maintains logical relationships within a knowledge graph. PCR restricts the search space to nodes reachable from an anchor node, preventing retrieval of structurally disconnected information that may lead to inconsistent reasoning. We evaluate PCR on PathRAG-6, a benchmark spanning six domains with 180 nodes and 360 edges. Our results show that PCR achieves full structural consistency compared to 24-32 percent in baseline methods, while maintaining strong relevance scores. On the technology domain, PCR obtains full relevance at rank 10 with full structural consistency, significantly outperforming vector search and hybrid retrieval. PCR reduces the average graph distance of retrieved context by 78 percent compared to baselines, demonstrating retrieval of more structurally consistent information. These findings suggest that path-constrained retrieval is an effective approach for improving the reliability and coherence of LLM agent reasoning systems.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Knowledge- and tool-augmented reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 5 of its 15 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Nov 2025.
Builds on
5 of 15 references.
References · 5
- 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,160
- 2020Dense Passage Retrieval for Open-Domain Question Answeringcited by 3,779
- 2020REALM: Retrieval-Augmented Language Model Pre-Trainingcited by 2,126
- 2022Language Models (Mostly) Know What They Knowcited by 1,783
- 2022Bringing Your Own View: Graph Contrastive Learning without Prefabricated Data Augmentationscited by 28
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Retrieval as Reasoning: Self-Evolving Agent-Native Retrieval via LLM-Wiki
- 2025Agent-as-a-Graph: Knowledge Graph-Based Tool and Agent Retrieval for LLM Multi-Agent Systems
- 2025Think-on-Graph 3.0: Efficient and Adaptive LLM Reasoning on Heterogeneous Graphs via Multi-Agent Dual-Evolving Context Retrieval
- 2025Knowledge-Aware Iterative Retrieval for Multi-Agent Systems
- 2026GraphScout: Empowering Large Language Models with Intrinsic Exploration Ability for Agentic Graph Reasoning
- 2026Rethinking Reasoning-Intensive Retrieval: Evaluating and Advancing Retrievers in Agentic Search Systems
- 2025GraphSearch: An Agentic Deep Searching Workflow for Graph Retrieval-Augmented Generation
- 2026Do We Still Need GraphRAG? Benchmarking RAG and GraphRAG for Agentic Search Systems