A superpersuasive autonomous policy debating system
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The capacity for highly complex, evidence-based, and strategically adaptive persuasion remains a formidable great challenge for artificial intelligence. Previous work, like IBM Project Debater, focused on generating persuasive speeches in simplified and shortened debate formats intended for relatively lay audiences. We introduce DeepDebater, a novel autonomous system capable of participating in and winning a full, unmodified, two-team competitive policy debate. Our system employs a hierarchical architecture of specialized multi-agent workflows, where teams of LLM-powered agents collaborate and critique one another to perform discrete argumentative tasks. Each workflow utilizes iterative retrieval, synthesis, and self-correction using a massive corpus of policy debate evidence (OpenDebateEvidence) and produces complete speech transcripts, cross-examinations, and rebuttals. We introduce a live, interactive end-to-end presentation pipeline that renders debates with AI speech and animation: transcripts are surface-realized and synthesized to audio with OpenAI TTS, and then displayed as talking-head portrait videos with EchoMimic V1. Beyond fully autonomous matches (AI vs AI), DeepDebater supports hybrid human-AI operation: human debaters can intervene at any stage, and humans can optionally serve as opponents against AI in any speech, allowing AI-human and AI-AI rounds. In preliminary evaluations against human-authored cases, DeepDebater produces qualitatively superior argumentative components and consistently wins simulated rounds as adjudicated by an independent autonomous judge. Expert human debate coaches also prefer the arguments, evidence, and cases constructed by DeepDebater. We open source all code, generated speech transcripts, audio and talking head video here: https://github.com/Hellisotherpeople/DeepDebater/tree/main
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 22 Nov 2025.
Builds on
0 of 0 references.
No references here yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2024Can LLMs Beat Humans in Debating? A Dynamic Multi-agent Framework for Competitive Debate
- 2025R-Debater: Retrieval-Augmented Debate Generation through Argumentative Memory
- 2026Mixture of Debaters: Learn to Debate at Architectural Level in Multi-Agent Reasoning
- 2025Strategic Planning and Rationalizing on Trees Make LLMs Better Debaters
- 2025iMAD: Intelligent Multi-Agent Debate for Efficient and Accurate LLM Inference
- 2026A Theory of Post-hoc Debate Judgement
- 2026Learning from Self-Debate: Preparing Reasoning Models for Multi-Agent Debate
- 2026Demystifying Multi-Agent Debate: The Role of Confidence and Diversity