mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Deepfake Geography: Detecting AI-Generated Satellite Images

arXiv 2511.17766 ↗First posted 21 Nov 2025cs.CVcited by 0

On the map: Diffusion models → Inverse problems and image restoration

Abstract (arXiv)

The rapid advancement of generative models such as StyleGAN2 and Stable Diffusion poses a growing threat to the authenticity of satellite imagery, which is increasingly vital for reliable analysis and decision-making across scientific and security domains. While deepfake detection has been extensively studied in facial contexts, satellite imagery presents distinct challenges, including terrain-level inconsistencies and structural artifacts. In this study, we conduct a comprehensive comparison between Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) and Vision Transformers (ViTs) for detecting AI-generated satellite images. Using a curated dataset of over 130,000 labeled RGB images from the DM-AER and FSI datasets, we show that ViTs significantly outperform CNNs in both accuracy (95.11 percent vs. 87.02 percent) and overall robustness, owing to their ability to model long-range dependencies and global semantic structures. We further enhance model transparency using architecture-specific interpretability methods, including Grad-CAM for CNNs and Chefer's attention attribution for ViTs, revealing distinct detection behaviors and validating model trustworthiness. Our results highlight the ViT's superior performance in detecting structural inconsistencies and repetitive textural patterns characteristic of synthetic imagery. Future work will extend this research to multispectral and SAR modalities and integrate frequency-domain analysis to further strengthen detection capabilities and safeguard satellite imagery integrity in high-stakes applications.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Inverse problems and image restoration, one of 14 directions in Diffusion models. Builds on 10 of its 23 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Nov 2025.

Builds on

10 of 23 references.

References · 10

  1. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
  2. 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,733
  3. 2020Transformer Interpretability Beyond Attention Visualizationcited by 627
  4. 2019Object Detection in Optical Remote Sensing Images: A Survey and A New Benchmarkcited by 340
  5. 2019Detecting and Simulating Artifacts in GAN Fake Imagescited by 293
  6. 2020Watch your Up-Convolution: CNN Based Generative Deep Neural Networks are Failing to Reproduce Spectral Distributionscited by 280
  7. 2020The Creation and Detection of Deepfakes: A Surveycited by 247
  8. 2019FakeCatcher: Detection of Synthetic Portrait Videos using Biological Signalscited by 145
  9. 2021M2TR: Multi-modal Multi-scale Transformers for Deepfake Detectioncited by 114
  10. 2018The SEN1-2 Dataset for Deep Learning in SAR-Optical Data Fusioncited by 42

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Towards a satellite image manipulation and deepfake localization benchmark dataset
  2. 2024Generating Synthetic Satellite Imagery With Deep-Learning Text-to-Image Models -- Technical Challenges and Implications for Monitoring and Verification
  3. 2026The Emerging Paradigm of Geospatial Foundation Models: From Pre-Training to Agentic Reasoning
  4. 2024SatSynth: Augmenting Image-Mask Pairs through Diffusion Models for Aerial Semantic Segmentation
  5. 2025RSFAKE-1M: A Large-Scale Dataset for Detecting Diffusion-Generated Remote Sensing Forgeries
  6. 2026How well are open sourced AI-generated image detection models out-of-the-box: A comprehensive benchmark study
  7. 2023DiffusionSat: A Generative Foundation Model for Satellite Imagery
  8. 2026Sat-JEPA-Diff: Bridging Self-Supervised Learning and Generative Diffusion for Remote Sensing