mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Non-Parametric Probabilistic Robustness: A Conservative Risk Estimator under Unknown Perturbation Distributions

arXiv 2511.17380 ↗First posted 21 Nov 2025cs.CV cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Deep learning (DL) models, despite their remarkable success, remain vulnerable to small input perturbations that can cause erroneous outputs, motivating the recent proposal of probabilistic robustness (PR) as a complementary alternative to adversarial robustness (AR). However, existing PR formulations assume a fixed and known perturbation distribution, an unrealistic expectation in practice. To address this limitation, we propose non-parametric probabilistic robustness (NPPR), a more practical PR metric that does not rely on any predefined perturbation distribution. Following the non-parametric paradigm in statistical modeling, NPPR learns an optimized perturbation distribution directly from data, enabling conservative PR evaluation under distributional uncertainty. We further develop an NPPR estimator based on a Gaussian Mixture Model (GMM), covering various input-dependent and input-independent perturbation scenarios. Theoretical analyses establish the relationships among AR, PR, and NPPR. Extensive experiments on CIFAR-10, CIFAR-100, and Tiny ImageNet across ResNet18/50, WideResNet50 and VGG16 validate NPPR as a more practical robustness metric, showing conservative (lower) PR estimates compared to assuming those common perturbation distributions used in state-of-the-arts.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Nov 2025.

Builds on

22 of 39 references.

References · 22

  1. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,364
  2. 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,155
  3. 2016Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Networkscited by 2,998
  4. 2016Categorical Reparameterization with Gumbel-Softmaxcited by 2,739
  5. 2016The Concrete Distribution: A Continuous Relaxation of Discrete Random Variablescited by 1,148
  6. 2021Real-ESRGAN: Training Real-World Blind Super-Resolution with Pure Synthetic Datacited by 970
  7. 2015The Limitations of Deep Learning in Adversarial Settingscited by 790
  8. 2019Black-Box Adversarial Attack with Transferable Model-based Embeddingcited by 57
  9. 2018A Statistical Approach to Assessing Neural Network Robustnesscited by 54
  10. 2022Adversarial Robustness of Deep Neural Networks: A Survey from a Formal Verification Perspectivecited by 42
  11. 2022Probabilistically Robust Learning: Balancing Average- and Worst-case Performancecited by 37
  12. 2020Scalable Quantitative Verification For Deep Neural Networkscited by 31
10 more
  1. 2020Universal Adversarial Perturbations: A Surveycited by 28
  2. 2022SAFARI: Versatile and Efficient Evaluations for Robustness of Interpretabilitycited by 28
  3. 2021CC-Cert: A Probabilistic Approach to Certify General Robustness of Neural Networkscited by 19
  4. 2022PRoA: A Probabilistic Robustness Assessment against Functional Perturbationscited by 19
  5. 2019Statistically Robust Neural Network Classificationcited by 16
  6. 2022On the (Non-)Robustness of Two-Layer Neural Networks in Different Learning Regimescited by 11
  7. 2024ProTIP: Probabilistic Robustness Verification on Text-to-Image Diffusion Models against Stochastic Perturbationcited by 10
  8. 2021Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Networks Learned by Transductioncited by 8
  9. 2025Probabilistic Robustness in Deep Learning: A Concise yet Comprehensive Guidecited by 6
  10. 2025PRBench: A Standardized Probabilistic Robustness Benchmarkcited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.