A Robust Federated Learning Approach for Combating Attacks Against IoT Systems Under non-IID Challenges
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In the context of the growing proliferation of user devices and the concurrent surge in data volumes, the complexities arising from the substantial increase in data have posed formidable challenges to conventional machine learning model training. Particularly, this is evident within resource-constrained and security-sensitive environments such as those encountered in networks associated with the Internet of Things (IoT). Federated Learning has emerged as a promising remedy to these challenges by decentralizing model training to edge devices or parties, effectively addressing privacy concerns and resource limitations. Nevertheless, the presence of statistical heterogeneity in non-Independently and Identically Distributed (non-IID) data across different parties poses a significant hurdle to the effectiveness of FL. Many FL approaches have been proposed to enhance learning effectiveness under statistical heterogeneity. However, prior studies have uncovered a gap in the existing research landscape, particularly in the absence of a comprehensive comparison between federated methods addressing statistical heterogeneity in detecting IoT attacks. In this research endeavor, we delve into the exploration of FL algorithms, specifically FedAvg, FedProx, and Scaffold, under different data distributions. Our focus is on achieving a comprehensive understanding of and addressing the challenges posed by statistical heterogeneity. In this study, We classify large-scale IoT attacks by utilizing the CICIoT2023 dataset. Through meticulous analysis and experimentation, our objective is to illuminate the performance nuances of these FL methods, providing valuable insights for researchers and practitioners in the domain.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 47 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Nov 2025.
Builds on
16 of 47 references.
References · 16
- 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,669
- 2019Advances and Open Problems in Federated Learningcited by 3,046
- 2018Federated Optimization in Heterogeneous Networkscited by 2,987
- 2019Measuring the Effects of Non-Identical Data Distribution for Federated Visual Classificationcited by 851
- 2020Personalized Federated Learning with Moreau Envelopescited by 618
- 2018Federated Learning for Mobile Keyboard Predictioncited by 572
- 2019One-Shot Federated Learningcited by 125
- 2020Lower Bounds and Optimal Algorithms for Personalized Federated Learningcited by 123
- 2021Distributionally Robust Federated Averagingcited by 104
- 2018D"IoT: A Federated Self-learning Anomaly Detection System for IoTcited by 89
- 2020Federated Bayesian Optimization via Thompson Samplingcited by 77
- 2020Federated Learning with Only Positive Labelscited by 55
4 more
- 2020The OARF Benchmark Suite: Characterization and Implications for Federated Learning Systemscited by 31
- 2017Attribution Modeling Increases Efficiency of Bidding in Display Advertisingcited by 19
- 2025Advancing Brain Tumor Segmentation via Attention-based 3D U-Net Architecture and Digital Image Processingcited by 1
- 2025A Novel Approach to Breast Cancer Segmentation using U-Net Model with Attention Mechanisms and FedProxcited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.