Exploring the use of AI authors and reviewers at Agents4Science
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
There is growing interest in using AI agents for scientific research, yet fundamental questions remain about their capabilities as scientists and reviewers. To explore these questions, we organized Agents4Science, the first conference in which AI agents serve as both primary authors and reviewers, with humans as co-authors and co-reviewers. Here, we discuss the key learnings from the conference and their implications for human-AI collaboration in science.
Key facts. Cited by 13 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 0 of its 3 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Nov 2025.
Builds on
0 of 3 references.
No references here yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 12.
13 papers.
Sort:
By area:
- 2026Stop Automating Peer Review Without Rigorous Evaluationcited by 12
- 2026LLM hallucinations in the wild: Large-scale evidence from non-existent citationscited by 7
- 2026Agentic AI Scientists Are Not Built For Autonomous Scientific Discoverycited by 7
- 2025To Err Is Human: Systematic Quantification of Errors in Published AI Papers via LLM Analysiscited by 5
- 2026LLM-as-a-Reviewer: Benchmarking Their Ability, Divergence, and Prompt Injection Resistance as Paper Reviewerscited by 2
- 2026Gaming AI-Assisted Peer Reviews Poses New Risks to the Scientific Communitycited by 2
- 2026Agentic Publication Protocol: An Attempt to Modernize Scientific Publicationcited by 2
- 2026Distributed Denial of Science: How Indirect Data Poisoning of AI Systems Can Industrialize Scientific Fraudcited by 2
- 2026The Agentification of Scientific Research: A Physicist's Perspectivecited by 1
- 2026PaperDoctor: Evidence-Grounded and Actionable Feedback for Scientific Papers in Progresscited by 0
- 2026RECLAIM: Can Agents Reproduce the Claims of Machine Learning Papers?cited by 0
- 2026Science or Slop?: Benchmarking and Mitigating Scientific Slop in AI-Generated Paperscited by 0
- 2026A Society of Researchers: Designing Institutions for Populations of Autonomous Research Agents7 Oct 2026
- 2026Science or Slop?: Benchmarking and Mitigating Scientific Slop in AI-Generated Papers30 Sep 2026
- 2026RECLAIM: Can Agents Reproduce the Claims of Machine Learning Papers?23 Sep 2026
- 2026PaperDoctor: Evidence-Grounded and Actionable Feedback for Scientific Papers in Progress15 Sep 2026
- 2026Distributed Denial of Science: How Indirect Data Poisoning of AI Systems Can Industrialize Scientific Fraud12 Jul 2026
- 2026Agentic Publication Protocol: An Attempt to Modernize Scientific Publication15 Jun 2026
- 2026Gaming AI-Assisted Peer Reviews Poses New Risks to the Scientific Community8 Jun 2026
- 2026LLM-as-a-Reviewer: Benchmarking Their Ability, Divergence, and Prompt Injection Resistance as Paper Reviewers25 May 2026
- 2026Agentic AI Scientists Are Not Built For Autonomous Scientific Discovery9 May 2026
- 2026LLM hallucinations in the wild: Large-scale evidence from non-existent citations8 May 2026
- 2026Stop Automating Peer Review Without Rigorous Evaluation4 May 2026
- 2026The Agentification of Scientific Research: A Physicist's Perspective16 Apr 2026
- 2026Agentic AI Scientists Are Not Built For Autonomous Scientific Discoverycited by 7
- 2026Agentic Publication Protocol: An Attempt to Modernize Scientific Publicationcited by 2
- 2026PaperDoctor: Evidence-Grounded and Actionable Feedback for Scientific Papers in Progresscited by 0
- 2026RECLAIM: Can Agents Reproduce the Claims of Machine Learning Papers?cited by 0
- 2026A Society of Researchers: Designing Institutions for Populations of Autonomous Research Agentscited by 0
- 2026A Society of Researchers: Designing Institutions for Populations of Autonomous Research Agents7 Oct 2026
- 2026RECLAIM: Can Agents Reproduce the Claims of Machine Learning Papers?23 Sep 2026
- 2026PaperDoctor: Evidence-Grounded and Actionable Feedback for Scientific Papers in Progress15 Sep 2026
- 2026Agentic Publication Protocol: An Attempt to Modernize Scientific Publication15 Jun 2026
- 2026Agentic AI Scientists Are Not Built For Autonomous Scientific Discovery9 May 2026
- 2026Stop Automating Peer Review Without Rigorous Evaluationcited by 12
- 2026LLM hallucinations in the wild: Large-scale evidence from non-existent citationscited by 7
- 2025To Err Is Human: Systematic Quantification of Errors in Published AI Papers via LLM Analysiscited by 5
- 2026Gaming AI-Assisted Peer Reviews Poses New Risks to the Scientific Communitycited by 2
- 2026The Agentification of Scientific Research: A Physicist's Perspectivecited by 1
- 2026Science or Slop?: Benchmarking and Mitigating Scientific Slop in AI-Generated Paperscited by 0
- 2026Science or Slop?: Benchmarking and Mitigating Scientific Slop in AI-Generated Papers30 Sep 2026
- 2026Gaming AI-Assisted Peer Reviews Poses New Risks to the Scientific Community8 Jun 2026
- 2026LLM hallucinations in the wild: Large-scale evidence from non-existent citations8 May 2026
- 2026Stop Automating Peer Review Without Rigorous Evaluation4 May 2026
- 2026The Agentification of Scientific Research: A Physicist's Perspective16 Apr 2026
- 2025To Err Is Human: Systematic Quantification of Errors in Published AI Papers via LLM Analysis5 Dec 2025