mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Data Whitening Improves Sparse Autoencoder Learning

arXiv 2511.13981 ↗First posted 17 Nov 2025cs.LG cs.AIcited by 2

On the map: Mechanistic interpretability → Sparse autoencoder training and evaluation

Abstract (arXiv)

Sparse autoencoders (SAEs) have emerged as a promising approach for learning interpretable features from neural network activations. However, the optimization landscape for SAE training can be challenging due to correlations in the input data. We demonstrate that applying PCA Whitening to input activations -- a standard preprocessing technique in classical sparse coding -- improves SAE performance across multiple metrics. Through theoretical analysis and simulation, we show that whitening transforms the optimization landscape, making it more convex and easier to navigate. We evaluate both ReLU and Top-K SAEs across diverse model architectures, widths, and sparsity regimes. Empirical evaluation on SAEBench, a comprehensive benchmark for sparse autoencoders, reveals that whitening consistently improves interpretability metrics, including sparse probing accuracy and feature disentanglement, despite minor drops in reconstruction quality. Our results challenge the assumption that interpretability aligns with an optimal sparsity--fidelity trade-off and suggest that whitening should be considered as a default preprocessing step for SAE training, particularly when interpretability is prioritized over perfect reconstruction.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Sparse autoencoder training and evaluation, one of 13 directions in Mechanistic interpretability. First posted on arXiv 17 Nov 2025.

Builds on

0 of 0 references.

No references here yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025SplInterp: Improving our Understanding and Training of Sparse Autoencoders
  2. 2025Train One Sparse Autoencoder Across Multiple Sparsity Budgets to Preserve Interpretability and Accuracy
  3. 2026Improving Robustness In Sparse Autoencoders via Masked Regularization
  4. 2025Evaluating Sparse Autoencoders: From Shallow Design to Matching Pursuit
  5. 2026Are Sparse Autoencoder Benchmarks Reliable?
  6. 2025Analysis of Variational Sparse Autoencoders
  7. 2024Features that Make a Difference: Leveraging Gradients for Improved Dictionary Learning
  8. 2024Compute Optimal Inference and Provable Amortisation Gap in Sparse Autoencoders