mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

TCM-5CEval: Extended Deep Evaluation Benchmark for LLM's Comprehensive Clinical Research Competence in Traditional Chinese Medicine

arXiv 2511.13169 ↗First posted 17 Nov 2025cs.CLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated exceptional capabilities in general domains, yet their application in highly specialized and culturally-rich fields like Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) requires rigorous and nuanced evaluation. Building upon prior foundational work such as TCM-3CEval, which highlighted systemic knowledge gaps and the importance of cultural-contextual alignment, we introduce TCM-5CEval, a more granular and comprehensive benchmark. TCM-5CEval is designed to assess LLMs across five critical dimensions: (1) Core Knowledge (TCM-Exam), (2) Classical Literacy (TCM-LitQA), (3) Clinical Decision-making (TCM-MRCD), (4) Chinese Materia Medica (TCM-CMM), and (5) Clinical Non-pharmacological Therapy (TCM-ClinNPT). We conducted a thorough evaluation of fifteen prominent LLMs, revealing significant performance disparities and identifying top-performing models like deepseekr1 and gemini25pro. Our findings show that while models exhibit proficiency in recalling foundational knowledge, they struggle with the interpretative complexities of classical texts. Critically, permutation-based consistency testing reveals widespread fragilities in model inference. All evaluated models, including the highest-scoring ones, displayed a substantial performance degradation when faced with varied question option ordering, indicating a pervasive sensitivity to positional bias and a lack of robust understanding. TCM-5CEval not only provides a more detailed diagnostic tool for LLM capabilities in TCM but aldso exposes fundamental weaknesses in their reasoning stability. To promote further research and standardized comparison, TCM-5CEval has been uploaded to the Medbench platform, joining its predecessor in the "In-depth Challenge for Comprehensive TCM Abilities" special track.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Nov 2025.

Builds on

9 of 32 references.

References · 9

  1. 2025Empowering LLMs with Logical Reasoning: A Comprehensive Surveycited by 51
  2. 2024Reasoning Abilities of Large Language Models: In-Depth Analysis on the Abstraction and Reasoning Corpuscited by 32
  3. 2023Leveraging Medical Knowledge Graphs Into Large Language Models for Diagnosis Prediction: Design and Application Studycited by 30
  4. 2021Assessing the Impact of Automated Suggestions on Decision Making: Domain Experts Mediate Model Errors but Take Less Initiativecited by 28
  5. 2024TCMBench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Evaluating Large Language Models in Traditional Chinese Medicinecited by 17
  6. 2024TCMD: A Traditional Chinese Medicine QA Dataset for Evaluating Large Language Modelscited by 5
  7. 2025TCM-Ladder: A Benchmark for Multimodal Question Answering on Traditional Chinese Medicinecited by 5
  8. 2025TCM-3CEval: A Triaxial Benchmark for Assessing Responses from Large Language Models in Traditional Chinese Medicinecited by 4
  9. 2025MTCMB: A Multi-Task Benchmark Framework for Evaluating LLMs on Knowledge, Reasoning, and Safety in Traditional Chinese Medicinecited by 4

Built on by

Not cited yet.