mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

An Evaluation Framework for Network IDS/IPS Datasets: Leveraging MITRE ATT&CK and Industry Relevance Metrics

arXiv 2511.12743 ↗First posted 16 Nov 2025cs.CR cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The performance of Machine Learning (ML) and Deep Learning (DL)-based Intrusion Detection and Prevention Systems (IDS/IPS) is critically dependent on the relevance and quality of the datasets used for training and evaluation. However, current AI model evaluation practices for developing IDS/IPS focus predominantly on accuracy metrics, often overlooking whether datasets represent industry-specific threats. To address this gap, we introduce a novel multi-dimensional framework that integrates the MITRE ATT&CK knowledge base for threat intelligence and employs five complementary metrics that together provide a comprehensive assessment of dataset suitability. Methodologically, this framework combines threat intelligence, natural language processing, and quantitative analysis to assess the suitability of datasets for specific industry contexts. Applying this framework to nine publicly available IDS/IPS datasets reveals significant gaps in threat coverage, particularly in the healthcare, energy, and financial sectors. In particular, recent datasets (e.g., CIC-IoMT, CIC-UNSW-NB15) align better with sector-specific threats, whereas others, like CICIoV-24, underperform despite their recency. Our findings provide a standardized, interpretable approach for selecting datasets aligned with sector-specific operational requirements, ultimately enhancing the real-world effectiveness of AI-driven IDS/IPS deployments. The efficiency and practicality of the framework are validated through deployment in a real-world case study, underscoring its capacity to inform dataset selection and enhance the effectiveness of AI-driven IDS/IPS in operational environments.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 74 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Nov 2025.

Builds on

16 of 74 references.

References · 16

  1. 2013Efficient Estimation of Word Representations in Vector Spacecited by 4,375
  2. 2020MPNet: Masked and Permuted Pre-training for Language Understandingcited by 981
  3. 2019A Survey of Network-based Intrusion Detection Data Setscited by 46
  4. 2021Towards a Standard Feature Set for Network Intrusion Detection System Datasetscited by 40
  5. 2023Ethical Considerations for Responsible Data Curationcited by 17
  6. 2024Machine learning-based network intrusion detection for big and imbalanced data using oversampling, stacking feature embedding and feature extractioncited by 16
  7. 2022A Dependable Hybrid Machine Learning Model for Network Intrusion Detectioncited by 12
  8. 2023MITRE ATT&CK: State of the Art and Way Forwardcited by 12
  9. 2025Network Intrusion Datasets: A Survey, Limitations, and Recommendationscited by 7
  10. 2022FedDef: Defense Against Gradient Leakage in Federated Learning-based Network Intrusion Detection Systemscited by 6
  11. 2019A Robust Comparison of the KDDCup99 and NSL-KDD IoT Network Intrusion Detection Datasets Through Various Machine Learning Algorithmscited by 3
  12. 2021Bridging the gap to real-world for network intrusion detection systems with data-centric approachcited by 2
4 more
  1. 2024Expectations Versus Reality: Evaluating Intrusion Detection Systems in Practicecited by 2
  2. 2021Emerging Trends of Recently Published Datasets for Intrusion Detection Systems (IDS): A Surveycited by 1
  3. 2023ForensiBlock: A Provenance-Driven Blockchain Framework for Data Forensics and Auditabilitycited by 1
  4. 2025A Secured Triad of IoT, Machine Learning, and Blockchain for Crop Forecasting in Agriculturecited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.