mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Improving the Generalisation of Learned Reconstruction Frameworks

arXiv 2511.12730 ↗First posted 16 Nov 2025eess.IV cs.CVcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Ensuring proper generalization is a critical challenge in applying data-driven methods for solving inverse problems in imaging, as neural networks reconstructing an image must perform well across varied datasets and acquisition geometries. In X-ray Computed Tomography (CT), convolutional neural networks (CNNs) are widely used to filter the projection data but are ill-suited for this task as they apply grid-based convolutions to the sinogram, which inherently lies on a line manifold, not a regular grid. The CNNs, unaware of the geometry, are implicitly tied to it and require an excessive amount of parameters as they must infer the relations between measurements from the data rather than from prior information. The contribution of this paper is twofold. First, we introduce a graph data structure to represent CT acquisition geometries and tomographic data, providing a detailed explanation of the graph's structure for circular, cone-beam geometries. Second, we propose GLM, a hybrid neural network architecture that leverages both graph and grid convolutions to process tomographic data. We demonstrate that GLM outperforms CNNs when performance is quantified in terms of structural similarity and peak signal-to-noise ratio, despite the fact that GLM uses only a fraction of the trainable parameters. Compared to CNNs, GLM also requires significantly less training time and memory, and its memory requirements scale better. Crucially, GLM demonstrates robust generalization to unseen variations in the acquisition geometry, like when training only on fully sampled CT data and then testing on sparse-view CT data.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Nov 2025.

Builds on

19 of 31 references.

References · 19

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
  3. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,305
  4. 2016Semi-Supervised Classification with Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 11,361
  5. 2017Inductive Representation Learning on Large Graphscited by 6,320
  6. 2019Fast Graph Representation Learning with PyTorch Geometriccited by 2,434
  7. 2016Convolutional Neural Networks on Graphs with Fast Localized Spectral Filteringcited by 2,089
  8. 2018Image Transformercited by 772
  9. 2022Recipe for a General, Powerful, Scalable Graph Transformercited by 713
  10. 2016Deep Convolutional Neural Network for Inverse Problems in Imagingcited by 433
  11. 2017Residual Gated Graph ConvNetscited by 346
  12. 2017Learned Primal-dual Reconstructioncited by 251
7 more
  1. 2020FISTA-Net: Learning A Fast Iterative Shrinkage Thresholding Network for Inverse Problems in Imagingcited by 74
  2. 2020Learning to Encode Position for Transformer with Continuous Dynamical Modelcited by 61
  3. 2022Physics-/Model-Based and Data-Driven Methods for Low-Dose Computed Tomography: A surveycited by 14
  4. 2022Low-Dose CT Denoising via Sinogram Inner-Structure Transformercited by 13
  5. 2022Near-Exact Recovery for Tomographic Inverse Problems via Deep Learningcited by 13
  6. 20232DeteCT -- A large 2D expandable, trainable, experimental Computed Tomography dataset for machine learningcited by 9
  7. 2024Benchmarking learned algorithms for computed tomography image reconstruction taskscited by 6

Built on by

Not cited yet.