Preference Learning from Physics-Based Feedback: Tuning Language Models to Design BCC/B2 Superalloys
On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → Preference optimization for molecular design
Abstract (arXiv)
We apply preference learning to the task of language model-guided design of novel structural alloys. In contrast to prior work that focuses on generating stable inorganic crystals, our approach targets the synthesizeability of a specific structural class: BCC/B2 superalloys, an underexplored family of materials with potential applications in extreme environments. Using three open-weight models (LLaMA-3.1, Gemma-2, and OLMo-2), we demonstrate that language models can be optimized for multiple design objectives using a single, unified reward signal through Direct Preference Optimization (DPO). Unlike prior approaches that rely on heuristic or human-in-the-loop feedback (costly), our reward signal is derived from thermodynamic phase calculations, offering a scientifically grounded criterion for model tuning. To our knowledge, this is the first demonstration of preference-tuning a language model using physics-grounded feedback for structural alloy design. The resulting framework is general and extensible, providing a path forward for intelligent design-space exploration across a range of physical science domains.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Preference optimization for molecular design, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 16 of its 61 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Nov 2025.
Builds on
16 of 61 references.
Closest ancestors · 1
Same direction, newest first
Other references · 15
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,192
- 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 7,916
- 2024Gemma 2: Improving Open Language Models at a Practical Sizecited by 1,928
- 2023DSPy: Compiling Declarative Language Model Calls into Self-Improving Pipelinescited by 803
- 20242 OLMo 2 Furiouscited by 302
- 2021Crystal Diffusion Variational Autoencoder for Periodic Material Generationcited by 268
- 2024Scaling Laws for Reward Model Overoptimization in Direct Alignment Algorithmscited by 139
- 2024Large Language Models to Enhance Bayesian Optimizationcited by 127
- 2024Fine-Tuned Language Models Generate Stable Inorganic Materials as Textcited by 92
- 2024FlowLLM: Flow Matching for Material Generation with Large Language Models as Base Distributionscited by 52
- 2025LLINBO: Trustworthy LLM-in-the-Loop Bayesian Optimizationcited by 13
- 2024Generative Hierarchical Materials Searchcited by 12
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Reinforcement Fine-Tuning for Materials Design
- 2026MatMind: A Structure-Activity Knowledge-Driven Generative Foundation Model for Materials Science
- 2026Reinforcement Learning on the Discrete Composition Channel of a Crystal Generator: Validated Gains and Reward Hacking
- 2024Rapid and Automated Alloy Design with Graph Neural Network-Powered LLM-Driven Multi-Agent Systems
- 2024AtomAgents: Alloy design and discovery through physics-aware multi-modal multi-agent artificial intelligence
- 2026Agentic Resource Allocation for Batch Multi-Objective Bayesian Optimization in Autonomous Materials Discovery
- 2025AtomWorld: A Benchmark for Evaluating Spatial Reasoning in Large Language Models on Crystalline Materials
- 2026From Phase Prediction to Phase Design: A ReAct Agent Framework for High-Entropy Alloy Discovery