SURFACEBENCH: A Geometry-Aware Benchmark for Symbolic Surface Discovery
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Equation discovery from data is a central challenge in machine learning for science, which requires the recovery of concise symbolic expressions that govern complex physical and geometric phenomena. Recent large language model (LLM) approaches have shown promise in symbolic regression, yet existing benchmarks predominantly evaluate low-dimensional scalar functions and rely on string-level or regression-based metrics that fail to capture structural and geometric equivalence. We introduce SURFACEBENCH, the first geometry-aware benchmark for symbolic discovery of three-dimensional surfaces. Unlike scalar curve-fitting tasks, SURFACEBENCH targets surface-level reasoning, where multi-variable coupling, coordinate transformations, and geometric structure must be inferred directly from data. The benchmark comprises 183 analytically constructed, science-inspired surface equations across 15 categories and three representation paradigms: explicit, implicit, and parametric forms. Each task includes variable semantics and synthetically sampled 3D data, and is designed to stress symbolic composition, structural ambiguity, and representational non-uniqueness while mitigating memorization. To evaluate discovery quality, SURFACEBENCH incorporates symbolic equivalence checks with geometric metrics of the object-space (Chamfer and Hausdorff distances) and regression-based error measures, allowing evaluation of functional fidelity beyond algebraic syntax. Empirical evaluation across evolutionary, neural, and LLM-driven frameworks reveals that no current method achieves consistent performance across representation types, with LLM-based approaches exhibiting strong structural priors but limited robustness in parameter calibration and multi-equation reasoning.The code and data are available at this link: github.com/deep-symbolic-mathematics/surfacebench.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Nov 2025.
Builds on
18 of 30 references.
References · 18
- 2019DeepSDF: Learning Continuous Signed Distance Functions for Shape Representationcited by 2,689
- 2018Occupancy Networks: Learning 3D Reconstruction in Function Spacecited by 2,041
- 2016A Point Set Generation Network for 3D Object Reconstruction from a Single Imagecited by 979
- 2019AI Feynman: a Physics-Inspired Method for Symbolic Regressioncited by 548
- 2018AtlasNet: A Papier-Mach'e Approach to Learning 3D Surface Generationcited by 539
- 2017PDE-Net: Learning PDEs from Datacited by 311
- 2019Deep symbolic regression: Recovering mathematical expressions from data via risk-seeking policy gradientscited by 309
- 2021Contemporary Symbolic Regression Methods and their Relative Performancecited by 215
- 2022End-to-end symbolic regression with transformerscited by 203
- 2021Neural Symbolic Regression that Scalescited by 192
- 2024LLM-SR: Scientific Equation Discovery via Programming with Large Language Modelscited by 133
- 2024LLM and Simulation as Bilevel Optimizers: A New Paradigm to Advance Physical Scientific Discoverycited by 86
6 more
- 2024Symbolic Regression with a Learned Concept Librarycited by 83
- 2023Transformer-based Planning for Symbolic Regressioncited by 79
- 2025LLM-SRBench: A New Benchmark for Scientific Equation Discovery with Large Language Modelscited by 71
- 2022Rethinking Symbolic Regression Datasets and Benchmarks for Scientific Discoverycited by 46
- 2024Towards Scientific Discovery with Generative AI: Progress, Opportunities, and Challengescited by 41
- 2025EGG-SR: Embedding Symbolic Equivalence into Symbolic Regression via Equality Graphcited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.