MOBA: A Material-Oriented Backdoor Attack against LiDAR-based 3D Object Detection Systems
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
LiDAR-based 3D object detection is widely used in safety-critical systems. However, these systems remain vulnerable to backdoor attacks that embed hidden malicious behaviors during training. A key limitation of existing backdoor attacks is their lack of physical realizability, primarily due to the digital-to-physical domain gap. Digital triggers often fail in real-world settings because they overlook material-dependent LiDAR reflection properties. On the other hand, physically constructed triggers are often unoptimized, leading to low effectiveness or easy detectability.This paper introduces Material-Oriented Backdoor Attack (MOBA), a novel framework that bridges the digital-physical gap by explicitly modeling the material properties of real-world triggers. MOBA tackles two key challenges in physical backdoor design: 1) robustness of the trigger material under diverse environmental conditions, 2) alignment between the physical trigger's behavior and its digital simulation. First, we propose a systematic approach to selecting robust trigger materials, identifying titanium dioxide (TiO_2) for its high diffuse reflectivity and environmental resilience. Second, to ensure the digital trigger accurately mimics the physical behavior of the material-based trigger, we develop a novel simulation pipeline that features: (1) an angle-independent approximation of the Oren-Nayar BRDF model to generate realistic LiDAR intensities, and (2) a distance-aware scaling mechanism to maintain spatial consistency across varying depths. We conduct extensive experiments on state-of-the-art LiDAR-based and Camera-LiDAR fusion models, showing that MOBA achieves a 93.50% attack success rate, outperforming prior methods by over 41%. Our work reveals a new class of physically realizable threats and underscores the urgent need for defenses that account for material-level properties in real-world environments.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 13 Nov 2025.
Builds on
0 of 0 references.
No references here yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2024BadFusion: 2D-Oriented Backdoor Attacks against 3D Object Detection
- 2024Physical Backdoor: Towards Temperature-based Backdoor Attacks in the Physical World
- 2023Exorcising ''Wraith'': Protecting LiDAR-based Object Detector in Automated Driving System from Appearing Attacks
- 2024Detector Collapse: Physical-World Backdooring Object Detection to Catastrophic Overload or Blindness in Autonomous Driving
- 2025STONE: Pioneering the One-to-N Universal Backdoor Threat in 3D Point Cloud
- 2022Dangerous Cloaking: Natural Trigger based Backdoor Attacks on Object Detectors in the Physical World
- 2024On the Credibility of Backdoor Attacks Against Object Detectors in the Physical World
- 2021A Backdoor Attack against 3D Point Cloud Classifiers