Consensus Sampling for Safer Generative AI
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Motivated by undetectable risks in generative AI, we study a general robust aggregation problem: how to aggregate several probability distributions to boost safety. We present consensus sampling, a black-box algorithm that, given k distributions, has risk competitive with the average risk of the safest s while abstaining when there is insufficient agreement. This yields an architecture-agnostic approach to generative-model safety when the distributions are induced by models that can sample and evaluate output probabilities. We formalize the guarantee through R-robustness, which also bounds information leakage and adversarial influence. Inspired by robust statistics and the provable copyright protection algorithm of Vyas et al (2023), we show that while a standard mixture is vulnerable to one unsafe constituent, a pointwise-median construction provides robust intuition, and our efficient sampler is Pareto-optimal for the tradeoff between worst-case risk and abstention. Experiments on synthetic distributions and image generation illustrate the general mechanism and its motivating safety application. The method requires overlap among safe distributions, but it provides a model-agnostic way to inherit guarantees from an unknown reliable subset.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Nov 2025.
Builds on
18 of 30 references.
References · 18
- 2022Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Modelscited by 5,601
- 2019Universal Adversarial Triggers for Attacking and Analyzing NLPcited by 709
- 2024Sleeper Agents: Training Deceptive LLMs that Persist Through Safety Trainingcited by 478
- 2021DExperts: Decoding-Time Controlled Text Generation with Experts and Anti-Expertscited by 434
- 2024Mechanistic Interpretability for AI Safety -- A Reviewcited by 415
- 2021Large Language Models Can Be Strong Differentially Private Learnerscited by 405
- 2023Paraphrasing evades detectors of AI-generated text, but retrieval is an effective defensecited by 401
- 2018AI safety via debatecited by 384
- 2020Weight Poisoning Attacks on Pre-trained Modelscited by 318
- 2022Measuring Progress on Scalable Oversight for Large Language Modelscited by 212
- 2024Secret Collusion among AI Agents: Multi-Agent Deception via Steganographycited by 107
- 2023On Provable Copyright Protection for Generative Modelscited by 97
6 more
- 2022Planting Undetectable Backdoors in Machine Learning Modelscited by 55
- 2024Hidden in Plain Text: Emergence & Mitigation of Steganographic Collusion in LLMscited by 52
- 2022Perfectly Secure Steganography Using Minimum Entropy Couplingcited by 42
- 2025On the Impossibility of Separating Intelligence from Judgment: The Computational Intractability of Filtering for AI Alignmentcited by 12
- 2024Copyright-Protected Language Generation via Adaptive Model Fusioncited by 6
- 2025Robust Steganography from Large Language Modelscited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.