mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Path Signatures Enable Model-Free Mapping of RNA Modifications

arXiv 2511.08855 ↗First posted 12 Nov 2025q-bio.GN stat.MLcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Detecting chemical modifications on RNA molecules remains a key challenge in epitranscriptomics. Traditional reverse transcription-based sequencing methods introduce enzyme- and sequence-dependent biases and fragment RNA molecules, confounding the accurate mapping of modifications across the transcriptome. Nanopore direct RNA sequencing offers a powerful alternative by preserving native RNA molecules, enabling the detection of modifications at single-molecule resolution. However, current computational tools can identify only a limited subset of modification types within well-characterized sequence contexts for which ample training data exists. Here, we introduce a model-free computational method that reframes modification detection as an anomaly detection problem, requiring only canonical (unmodified) RNA reads without any other annotated data. For each nanopore read, our approach extracts robust, modification-sensitive features from the raw ionic current signal at a site using the signature transform, then computes an anomaly score by comparing the resulting feature vector to its nearest neighbors in an unmodified reference dataset. We convert anomaly scores into statistical p-values to enable anomaly detection at both individual read and site levels. Validation on densely-modified textitE. coli rRNA demonstrates that our approach detects known sites harboring diverse modification types, without prior training on these modifications. We further applyied this framework to dengue virus (DENV) transcripts and mammalian mRNAs. For DENV sfRNA, it led to revealing a novel 2'-O-methylated site, which we validate orthogonally by qRT-PCR assays. These results demonstrate that our model-free approach operates robustly across different types of RNAs and datasets generated with different nanopore sequencing chemistries.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 61 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Nov 2025.

Builds on

15 of 61 references.

References · 15

  1. 2021Testing for Outliers with Conformal p-valuescited by 133
  2. 2016A Primer on the Signature Method in Machine Learningcited by 100
  3. 2019Deep Signature Transformscited by 75
  4. 2018Signature moments to characterize laws of stochastic processescited by 54
  5. 2018The iisignature library: efficient calculation of iterated-integral signatures and log signaturescited by 38
  6. 2022Signature Methods in Machine Learningcited by 33
  7. 2020Distribution Regression for Sequential Datacited by 31
  8. 2019Embedding and learning with signaturescited by 29
  9. 2017Developing the Path Signature Methodology and its Application to Landmark-based Human Action Recognitioncited by 20
  10. 2017A signature-based machine learning model for bipolar disorder and borderline personality disordercited by 15
  11. 2023New directions in the applications of rough path theorycited by 12
  12. 2020Dimensionless Anomaly Detection on Multivariate Streams with Variance Norm and Path Signaturecited by 8
3 more
  1. 2024Novelty Detection on Radio Astronomy Data using Signaturescited by 4
  2. 2024Leave-One-Out-, Bootstrap- and Cross-Conformal Anomaly Detectorscited by 4
  3. 2025Full-conformal novelty detectioncited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.

1 paper.