LoopLLM: Transferable Energy-Latency Attacks in LLMs via Repetitive Generation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
As large language models (LLMs) scale, their inference incurs substantial computational resources, exposing them to energy-latency attacks, where crafted prompts induce high energy and latency cost. Existing attack methods aim to prolong output by delaying the generation of termination symbols. However, as the output grows longer, controlling the termination symbols through input becomes difficult, making these methods less effective. Therefore, we propose LoopLLM, an energy-latency attack framework based on the observation that repetitive generation can trigger low-entropy decoding loops, reliably compelling LLMs to generate until their output limits. LoopLLM introduces (1) a repetition-inducing prompt optimization that exploits autoregressive vulnerabilities to induce repetitive generation, and (2) a token-aligned ensemble optimization that aggregates gradients to improve cross-model transferability. Extensive experiments on 12 open-source and 2 commercial LLMs show that LoopLLM significantly outperforms existing methods, achieving over 90% of the maximum output length, compared to 20% for baselines, and improving transferability by around 40% to DeepSeek-V3 and Gemini 2.5 Flash.
Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 15 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Nov 2025.
Builds on
11 of 15 references.
References · 11
- 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 13,028
- 2023Universal and Transferable Adversarial Attacks on Aligned Language Modelscited by 3,104
- 2022Self-Instruct: Aligning Language Models with Self-Generated Instructionscited by 2,724
- 2023BloombergGPT: A Large Language Model for Financecited by 939
- 2020Sponge Examples: Energy-Latency Attacks on Neural Networkscited by 111
- 2022Learning to Break the Loop: Analyzing and Mitigating Repetitions for Neural Text Generationcited by 94
- 2024Coercing LLMs to do and reveal (almost) anythingcited by 89
- 2024Inducing High Energy-Latency of Large Vision-Language Models with Verbose Imagescited by 69
- 2024An Engorgio Prompt Makes Large Language Model Babble oncited by 30
- 2022Phantom Sponges: Exploiting Non-Maximum Suppression to Attack Deep Object Detectorscited by 28
- 2024Non-Halting Queries: Exploiting Fixed Points in LLMscited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 8.
8 papers.
- 2026RECUR: Resource Exhaustion Attack via Recursive-Entropy Guided Counterfactual Utilization and Reflectioncited by 4
- 2026Rethinking Latency Denial-of-Service: Attacking the LLM Serving Framework, Not the Modelcited by 2
- 2026LoopGuard: Breaking Self-Reinforcing Attention Loops via Dynamic KV Cache Interventioncited by 2
- 2026Asking Forever: Universal Activations Behind Turn Amplification in Conversational LLMscited by 0
- 2026VidDoS: Universal Denial-of-Service Attack on Video-based Large Language Modelscited by 0
- 2026Uncovering Uncontrolled Repetition through Residual Stream Dynamicscited by 0
- 2026When Reasoning Goes Astray: Attention Dynamics of Uncontrolled Reasoningcited by 0
- 2026Jumping the Line: Exploiting Length Predictions in LLM Schedulingcited by 0
- 2026Jumping the Line: Exploiting Length Predictions in LLM Scheduling2 Oct 2026
- 2026When Reasoning Goes Astray: Attention Dynamics of Uncontrolled Reasoning30 Sep 2026
- 2026Uncovering Uncontrolled Repetition through Residual Stream Dynamics30 Sep 2026
- 2026LoopGuard: Breaking Self-Reinforcing Attention Loops via Dynamic KV Cache Intervention11 Apr 2026
- 2026VidDoS: Universal Denial-of-Service Attack on Video-based Large Language Models2 Mar 2026
- 2026Asking Forever: Universal Activations Behind Turn Amplification in Conversational LLMs19 Feb 2026
- 2026RECUR: Resource Exhaustion Attack via Recursive-Entropy Guided Counterfactual Utilization and Reflection9 Feb 2026
- 2026Rethinking Latency Denial-of-Service: Attacking the LLM Serving Framework, Not the Model8 Feb 2026