mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Non-Halting Queries: Exploiting Fixed Points in LLMs

arXiv 2410.06287 ↗First posted 8 Oct 2024cs.LG cs.AI cs.CLcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We introduce a new vulnerability that exploits fixed points in autoregressive models and use it to craft queries that never halt. More precisely, for non-halting queries, the LLM never samples the end-of-string token <eos>. We rigorously analyze the conditions under which the non-halting anomaly presents itself. In particular, at temperature zero, we prove that if a repeating (cyclic) token sequence is observed at the output beyond the context size, then the LLM does not halt. We demonstrate non-halting queries in many experiments performed in base unaligned models where repeating prompts immediately lead to a non-halting cyclic behavior as predicted by the analysis. Further, we develop a simple recipe that takes the same fixed points observed in the base model and creates a prompt structure to target aligned models. We demonstrate the recipe's success in sending every major model released over the past year into a non-halting state with the same simple prompt even over higher temperatures. Further, we devise an experiment with 100 randomly selected tokens and show that the recipe to create non-halting queries succeeds with high success rates ranging from 97% for GPT-4o to 19% for Gemini Pro 1.5. These results show that the proposed adversarial recipe succeeds in bypassing alignment at one to two orders of magnitude higher rates compared to earlier reports. We also study gradient-based direct inversion using ARCA to craft new short prompts to induce the non-halting state. We inverted 10,000 random repeating 2-cycle outputs for llama-3.1-8b-instruct. Out of 10,000 three-token inverted prompts 1,512 yield non-halting queries reaching a rate of 15%. Our experiments with ARCA show that non-halting may be easily induced with as few as 3 input tokens with high probability. Overall, our experiments demonstrate that non-halting queries are prevalent and relatively easy to find.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Oct 2024.

Builds on

21 of 39 references.

References · 21

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  2. 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,160
  3. 2019The Curious Case of Neural Text Degenerationcited by 2,881
  4. 2020Extracting Training Data from Large Language Modelscited by 2,144
  5. 2023Jailbroken: How Does LLM Safety Training Fail?cited by 1,565
  6. 2022Ignore Previous Prompt: Attack Techniques For Language Modelscited by 760
  7. 2019CTRL: A Conditional Transformer Language Model for Controllable Generationcited by 754
  8. 2023A Watermark for Large Language Modelscited by 667
  9. 2023Scalable Extraction of Training Data from (Production) Language Modelscited by 415
  10. 2023Jailbreak and Guard Aligned Language Models with Only Few In-Context Demonstrationscited by 401
  11. 2023Formalizing and Benchmarking Prompt Injection Attacks and Defensescited by 328
  12. 2023Undetectable Watermarks for Language Modelscited by 208
9 more
  1. 2023Automatically Auditing Large Language Models via Discrete Optimizationcited by 187
  2. 2022A Survey of Controllable Text Generation using Transformer-based Pre-trained Language Modelscited by 128
  3. 2020Sponge Examples: Energy-Latency Attacks on Neural Networkscited by 108
  4. 2023Jatmo: Prompt Injection Defense by Task-Specific Finetuningcited by 89
  5. 2022Evaluating the Susceptibility of Pre-Trained Language Models via Handcrafted Adversarial Examplescited by 65
  6. 2022Gradient-Based Constrained Sampling from Language Modelscited by 64
  7. 2023Tricking LLMs into Disobedience: Formalizing, Analyzing, and Detecting Jailbreakscited by 45
  8. 2023Closing the Curious Case of Neural Text Degenerationcited by 30
  9. 2024From Loops to Oops: Fallback Behaviors of Language Models Under Uncertaintycited by 13

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 3.

4 papers.