mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Correcting False Alarms from Unseen: Adapting Graph Anomaly Detectors at Test Time

arXiv 2511.07023 ↗First posted 10 Nov 2025cs.LGcited by 12

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Graph anomaly detection (GAD), which aims to detect outliers in graph-structured data, has received increasing research attention recently. However, existing GAD methods assume identical training and testing distributions, which is rarely valid in practice. In real-world scenarios, unseen but normal samples may emerge during deployment, leading to a normality shift that degrades the performance of GAD models trained on the original data. Through empirical analysis, we reveal that the degradation arises from (1) semantic confusion, where unseen normal samples are misinterpreted as anomalies due to their novel patterns, and (2) aggregation contamination, where the representations of seen normal nodes are distorted by unseen normals through message aggregation. While retraining or fine-tuning GAD models could be a potential solution to the above challenges, the high cost of model retraining and the difficulty of obtaining labeled data often render this approach impractical in real-world applications. To bridge the gap, we proposed a lightweight and plug-and-play Test-time adaptation framework for correcting Unseen Normal pattErns (TUNE) in GAD. To address semantic confusion, a graph aligner is employed to align the shifted data to the original one at the graph attribute level. Moreover, we utilize the minimization of representation-level shift as a supervision signal to train the aligner, which leverages the estimated aggregation contamination as a key indicator of normality shift. Extensive experiments on 10 real-world datasets demonstrate that TUNE significantly enhances the generalizability of pre-trained GAD models to both synthetic and real unseen normal patterns.

Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 48 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Nov 2025.

Builds on

25 of 48 references.

References · 25

  1. 2016Semi-Supervised Classification with Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 11,361
  2. 2019A Comprehensive Survey on Graph Neural Networkscited by 2,919
  3. 2018Pitfalls of Graph Neural Network Evaluationcited by 1,007
  4. 2019Predicting Dynamic Embedding Trajectory in Temporal Interaction Networkscited by 448
  5. 2020Enhancing Graph Neural Network-based Fraud Detectors against Camouflaged Fraudsterscited by 250
  6. 2021A Comprehensive Survey on Graph Anomaly Detection with Deep Learningcited by 230
  7. 2022Rethinking Graph Neural Networks for Anomaly Detectioncited by 187
  8. 2021Anomaly Detection on Attributed Networks via Contrastive Self-Supervised Learningcited by 177
  9. 2020Rumor Detection on Social Media with Bi-Directional Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 153
  10. 2013From Amateurs to Connoisseurs: Modeling the Evolution of User Expertise through Online Reviewscited by 108
  11. 2022Empowering Graph Representation Learning with Test-Time Graph Transformationcited by 67
  12. 2025Assemble Your Crew: Automatic Multi-agent Communication Topology Design via Autoregressive Graph Generationcited by 58
13 more
  1. 2024ARC: A Generalist Graph Anomaly Detector with In-Context Learningcited by 48
  2. 2023Towards Self-Interpretable Graph-Level Anomaly Detectioncited by 41
  3. 2023GraphPatcher: Mitigating Degree Bias for Graph Neural Networks via Test-time Augmentationcited by 31
  4. 2025A Label-Free Heterophily-Guided Approach for Unsupervised Graph Fraud Detectioncited by 24
  5. 2024Partitioning Message Passing for Graph Fraud Detectioncited by 23
  6. 2023Revisiting Graph-Based Fraud Detection in Sight of Heterophily and Spectrumcited by 20
  7. 2025CLIP-Powered Domain Generalization and Domain Adaptation: A Comprehensive Surveycited by 15
  8. 2025Uncertainty-Aware Graph Neural Networks: A Multi-Hop Evidence Fusion Approachcited by 14
  9. 2025A Survey of Generalization of Graph Anomaly Detection: From Transfer Learning to Foundation Modelscited by 14
  10. 2025Bisecle: Binding and Separation in Continual Learning for Video Language Understandingcited by 13
  11. 2023Open-Set Graph Anomaly Detection via Normal Structure Regularisationcited by 11
  12. 2024Noise-Resilient Unsupervised Graph Representation Learning via Multi-Hop Feature Quality Estimationcited by 11
  13. 2024THESAURUS: Contrastive Graph Clustering by Swapping Fused Gromov-Wasserstein Couplingscited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 11.

12 papers.