mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Better Datasets Start From RefineLab: Automatic Optimization for High-Quality Dataset Refinement

arXiv 2511.06530 ↗First posted 9 Nov 2025cs.CLcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

High-quality Question-Answer (QA) datasets are foundational for reliable Large Language Model (LLM) evaluation, yet even expert-crafted datasets exhibit persistent gaps in domain coverage, misaligned difficulty distributions, and factual inconsistencies. The recent surge in generative model-powered datasets has compounded these quality challenges. In this work, we introduce RefineLab, the first LLM-driven framework that automatically refines raw QA textual data into high-quality datasets under a controllable token-budget constraint. RefineLab takes a set of target quality attributes (such as coverage and difficulty balance) as refinement objectives, and performs selective edits within a predefined token budget to ensure practicality and efficiency. In essence, RefineLab addresses a constrained optimization problem: improving the quality of QA samples as much as possible while respecting resource limitations. With a set of available refinement operations (e.g., rephrasing, distractor replacement), RefineLab takes as input the original dataset, a specified set of target quality dimensions, and a token budget, and determines which refinement operations should be applied to each QA sample. This process is guided by an assignment module that selects optimal refinement strategies to maximize overall dataset quality while adhering to the budget constraint. Experiments demonstrate that RefineLab consistently narrows divergence from expert datasets across coverage, difficulty alignment, factual fidelity, and distractor quality. RefineLab pioneers a scalable, customizable path to reproducible dataset design, with broad implications for LLM evaluation.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Nov 2025.

Builds on

26 of 32 references.

References · 26

  1. 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 10,109
  2. 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,297
  3. 2021Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Codecited by 8,320
  4. 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,963
  5. 2019HellaSwag: Can a Machine Really Finish Your Sentence?cited by 4,100
  6. 2021TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human Falsehoodscited by 2,975
  7. 2022Self-Instruct: Aligning Language Models with Self-Generated Instructionscited by 2,724
  8. 2023A Survey of Large Language Modelscited by 2,576
  9. 2018Can a Suit of Armor Conduct Electricity? A New Dataset for Open Book Question Answeringcited by 2,164
  10. 2022Program of Thoughts Prompting: Disentangling Computation from Reasoning for Numerical Reasoning Taskscited by 1,076
  11. 2023ChatDev: Communicative Agents for Software Developmentcited by 919
  12. 2017RACE: Large-scale ReAding Comprehension Dataset From Examinationscited by 861
14 more
  1. 2023Data Selection for Language Models via Importance Resamplingcited by 329
  2. 2023Large Language Model as Attributed Training Data Generator: A Tale of Diversity and Biascited by 232
  3. 2023What can Large Language Models do in chemistry? A comprehensive benchmark on eight taskscited by 185
  4. 2024BetterBench: Assessing AI Benchmarks, Uncovering Issues, and Establishing Best Practicescited by 114
  5. 2024AutoBencher: Towards Declarative Benchmark Constructioncited by 44
  6. 2023FLEEK: Factual Error Detection and Correction with Evidence Retrieved from External Knowledgecited by 25
  7. 2024Distractor Generation in Multiple-Choice Tasks: A Survey of Methods, Datasets, and Evaluationcited by 25
  8. 2024DataEnvGym: Data Generation Agents in Teacher Environments with Student Feedbackcited by 25
  9. 2024DataGen: Unified Synthetic Dataset Generation via Large Language Modelscited by 23
  10. 2023Beyond Scale: The Diversity Coefficient as a Data Quality Metric for Variability in Natural Language Datacited by 19
  11. 2024Quality Matters: Evaluating Synthetic Data for Tool-Using LLMscited by 19
  12. 2025Generating Plausible Distractors for Multiple-Choice Questions via Student Choice Predictioncited by 8
  13. 2023Assessing Distractors in Multiple-Choice Testscited by 3
  14. 2024SoftSRV: Learn to Generate Targeted Synthetic Datacited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.

3 papers.