mlsanityData to 13 Oct 2026

Event-driven physics-informed operator learning for reliability analysis

arXiv 2511.06083 ↗First posted 8 Nov 2025cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Reliability analysis of engineering systems under uncertainty poses significant computational challenges, particularly for problems involving high-dimensional stochastic inputs, nonlinear system responses, and multiphysics couplings. Traditional surrogate modeling approaches often incur high energy consumption, which severely limits their scalability and deployability in resource-constrained environments. We introduce NeuroPOL, textitthe first neuroscience-inspired physics-informed operator learning framework for reliability analysis. NeuroPOL incorporates Variable Spiking Neurons into a physics-informed operator architecture, replacing continuous activations with event-driven spiking dynamics. This innovation promotes sparse communication, significantly reduces computational load, and enables an energy-efficient surrogate model. The proposed framework lowers both computational and power demands, supporting real-time reliability assessment and deployment on edge devices and digital twins. By embedding governing physical laws into operator learning, NeuroPOL builds physics-consistent surrogates capable of accurate uncertainty propagation and efficient failure probability estimation, even for high-dimensional problems. We evaluate NeuroPOL on five canonical benchmarks, the Burgers equation, Nagumo equation, two-dimensional Poisson equation, two-dimensional Darcy equation, and incompressible Navier-Stokes equation with energy coupling. Results show that NeuroPOL achieves reliability measures comparable to standard physics-informed operators, while introducing significant communication sparsity, enabling scalable, distributed, and energy-efficient deployment.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 13 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Nov 2025.

Builds on

17 of 41 references.

References · 17

  1. 2020Fourier Neural Operator for Parametric Partial Differential Equationscited by 2,857
  2. 2019DeepONet: Learning nonlinear operators for identifying differential equations based on the universal approximation theorem of operatorscited by 1,989
  3. 2021Physics-Informed Neural Operator for Learning Partial Differential Equationscited by 522
  4. 2022Fourier Neural Operator with Learned Deformations for PDEs on General Geometriescited by 422
  5. 2022Transformer for Partial Differential Equations' Operator Learningcited by 276
  6. 2018Deep Learning in Spiking Neural Networkscited by 260
  7. 2021Adaptive Fourier Neural Operators: Efficient Token Mixers for Transformerscited by 243
  8. 2021Factorized Fourier Neural Operatorscited by 242
  9. 2020hp-VPINNs: Variational Physics-Informed Neural Networks With Domain Decompositioncited by 236
  10. 2022NOMAD: Nonlinear Manifold Decoders for Operator Learningcited by 83
  11. 2023Physics informed WNOcited by 27
  12. 2022Rate Coding or Direct Coding: Which One is Better for Accurate, Robust, and Energy-efficient Spiking Neural Networks?cited by 25
5 more
  1. 2022Stochastic projection based approach for gradient free physics informed learningcited by 15
  2. 2024Generative adversarial wavelet neural operator: Application to fault detection and isolation of multivariate time series datacited by 6
  3. 2023Neuroscience inspired scientific machine learning (Part-1): Variable spiking neuron for regressioncited by 5
  4. 2024Hybrid variable spiking graph neural networks for energy-efficient scientific machine learningcited by 3
  5. 2024Distribution free uncertainty quantification in neuroscience-inspired deep operatorscited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.