Influence of CAV Clustering Strategies on Mixed Traffic Flow Characteristics: An Analysis of Vehicle Trajectory Data
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Being one of the most promising applications enabled by connected and automated vehicles (CAV) technology, Cooperative Adaptive Cruise Control (CACC) is expected to be deployed in the near term on public roads. Thus far, the majority of the CACC studies have been focusing on the overall network performance with limited insights on the potential impacts of CAVs on human-driven vehicles (HVs).This paper aims to quantify such impacts by studying the high-resolution vehicle trajectory data that are obtained from microscopic simulation. Two platoon clustering strategies for CACC- an ad hoc coordination strategy and a local coordination strategy-are implemented. Results show that the local coordination outperforms the ad hoc coordination across all tested market penetration rates (MPRs) in terms of network throughput and productivity. According to the two-sample Kolmogorov-textcolorreSmirnov test, however, the distributions of the hard braking events (as a potential safety impact) for HVs change significantly under local coordination strategy. For both of the clustering strategy, CAVs increase the average lane change frequency for HVs. The break-even point for average lane change frequency between the two strategies is observed at 30% MPR, which decreases from 5.42 to 5.38 per vehicle. The average lane change frequency following a monotonically increasing pattern in response to MPR, and it reaches the highest 5.48 per vehicle at 40% MPR. Lastly, the interaction state of the car-following model for HVs is analyzed. It is revealed that the composition of the interaction state could be influenced by CAVs as well. One of the apparent trends is that the time spent on approaching state declines with the increasing presence of CAVs.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 16 Mar 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 1; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.
5 papers.
- 2023Traffic Prediction using Artificial Intelligence: Review of Recent Advances and Emerging Opportunitiescited by 16
- 2024Discovering Car-following Dynamics from Trajectory Data through Deep Learningcited by 1
- 2025Mitigating Traffic Oscillations in Mixed Traffic Flow with Scalable Deep Koopman Predictive Controlcited by 0
- 2025Self-Interest and Systemic Benefits: Emergence of Collective Rationality in Mixed Autonomy Traffic Through Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 0
- 2026LIDSA: Cognitive Arbitration for Signal-Free Autonomous Intersection Managementcited by 0
- 2026LIDSA: Cognitive Arbitration for Signal-Free Autonomous Intersection Management12 May 2026
- 2025Self-Interest and Systemic Benefits: Emergence of Collective Rationality in Mixed Autonomy Traffic Through Deep Reinforcement Learning7 Nov 2025
- 2025Mitigating Traffic Oscillations in Mixed Traffic Flow with Scalable Deep Koopman Predictive Control27 Jan 2025
- 2024Discovering Car-following Dynamics from Trajectory Data through Deep Learning1 Aug 2024
- 2023Traffic Prediction using Artificial Intelligence: Review of Recent Advances and Emerging Opportunities31 May 2023