Data Efficiency and Transfer Robustness in Biomedical Image Segmentation: A Study of Redundancy and Forgetting with Cellpose
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Generalist biomedical image segmentation models such as Cellpose are increasingly applied across diverse imaging modalities and cell types. However, two critical challenges remain underexplored: (1) the extent of training data redundancy and (2) the impact of cross domain transfer on model retention. In this study, we conduct a systematic empirical analysis of these challenges using Cellpose as a case study. First, to assess data redundancy, we propose a simple dataset quantization (DQ) strategy for constructing compact yet diverse training subsets. Experiments on the Cyto dataset show that image segmentation performance saturates with only 10% of the data, revealing substantial redundancy and potential for training with minimal annotations. Latent space analysis using MAE embeddings and t-SNE confirms that DQ selected patches capture greater feature diversity than random sampling. Second, to examine catastrophic forgetting, we perform cross domain finetuning experiments and observe significant degradation in source domain performance, particularly when adapting from generalist to specialist domains. We demonstrate that selective DQ based replay reintroducing just 5-10% of the source data effectively restores source performance, while full replay can hinder target adaptation. Additionally, we find that training domain sequencing improves generalization and reduces forgetting in multi stage transfer. Our findings highlight the importance of data centric design in biomedical image segmentation and suggest that efficient training requires not only compact subsets but also retention aware learning strategies and informed domain ordering. The code is available at https://github.com/MMV-Lab/biomedseg-efficiency.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 13 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 20 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Nov 2025.
Builds on
12 of 20 references.
References · 12
- 2021Masked Autoencoders Are Scalable Vision Learnerscited by 7,364
- 2018Experience Replay for Continual Learningcited by 1,082
- 2021Recent Advances of Continual Learning in Computer Vision: An Overviewcited by 55
- 2023Dataset Quantizationcited by 47
- 2021Diminishing Uncertainty within the Training Pool: Active Learning for Medical Image Segmentationcited by 44
- 2023Towards Sustainable Learning: Coresets for Data-efficient Deep Learningcited by 44
- 2023The Multi-modality Cell Segmentation Challenge: Towards Universal Solutionscited by 39
- 2023A comprehensive survey on deep active learning in medical image analysiscited by 34
- 2021Multi-Domain Incremental Learning for Semantic Segmentationcited by 25
- 2023Active learning for medical image segmentation with stochastic batchescited by 20
- 2024Continual Learning in Medical Imaging: A Survey and Practical Analysiscited by 9
- 2024Evolution-aware VAriance (EVA) Coreset Selection for Medical Image Classificationcited by 7
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Erase to Retain: Low Rank Adaptation Guided Selective Unlearning in Medical Segmentation Networks
- 2025SER-Diff: Synthetic Error Replay Diffusion for Incremental Brain Tumor Segmentation
- 2026Camyla: Scaling Autonomous Research in Medical Image Segmentation
- 2025Task-Specific Knowledge Distillation from the Vision Foundation Model for Enhanced Medical Image Segmentation
- 2024Generalizable Single-Source Cross-modality Medical Image Segmentation via Invariant Causal Mechanisms
- 2026Are Vision Foundation Models Foundational for Electron Microscopy Image Segmentation?
- 2025MSDM: Generating Task-Specific Pathology Images with a Multimodal Conditioned Diffusion Model for Cell and Nuclei Segmentation
- 2024Comprehensive Generative Replay for Task-Incremental Segmentation with Concurrent Appearance and Semantic Forgetting