Evaluating the Impact of Weather-Induced Sensor Occlusion on BEVFusion for 3D Object Detection
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Accurate 3D object detection is essential for automated vehicles to navigate safely in complex real-world environments. Bird's Eye View (BEV) representations, which project multi-sensor data into a top-down spatial format, have emerged as a powerful approach for robust perception. Although BEV-based fusion architectures have demonstrated strong performance through multimodal integration, the effects of sensor occlusions, caused by environmental conditions such as fog, haze, or physical obstructions, on 3D detection accuracy remain underexplored. In this work, we investigate the impact of occlusions on both camera and Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) outputs using the BEVFusion architecture, evaluated on the nuScenes dataset. Detection performance is measured using mean Average Precision (mAP) and the nuScenes Detection Score (NDS). Our results show that moderate camera occlusions lead to a 41.3% drop in mAP (from 35.6% to 20.9%) when detection is based only on the camera. On the other hand, LiDAR sharply drops in performance only under heavy occlusion, with mAP falling by 47.3% (from 64.7% to 34.1%), with a severe impact on long-range detection. In fused settings, the effect depends on which sensor is occluded: occluding the camera leads to a minor 4.1% drop (from 68.5% to 65.7%), while occluding LiDAR results in a larger 26.8% drop (to 50.1%), revealing the model's stronger reliance on LiDAR for the task of 3D object detection. Our results highlight the need for future research into occlusion-aware evaluation methods and improved sensor fusion techniques that can maintain detection accuracy in the presence of partial sensor failure or degradation due to adverse environmental conditions.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Nov 2025.
Builds on
17 of 29 references.
References · 17
- 2021Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windowscited by 12,082
- 2016Feature Pyramid Networks for Object Detectioncited by 5,021
- 2019nuScenes: A multimodal dataset for autonomous drivingcited by 4,485
- 2019Scalability in Perception for Autonomous Driving: Waymo Open Datasetcited by 2,436
- 2018PointPillars: Fast Encoders for Object Detection from Point Cloudscited by 1,707
- 2022BEVFormer: Learning Bird's-Eye-View Representation from Multi-Camera Images via Spatiotemporal Transformerscited by 1,213
- 2020Center-based 3D Object Detection and Trackingcited by 1,143
- 2020Lift, Splat, Shoot: Encoding Images From Arbitrary Camera Rigs by Implicitly Unprojecting to 3Dcited by 1,040
- 2022BEVFusion: Multi-Task Multi-Sensor Fusion with Unified Bird's-Eye View Representationcited by 844
- 2022TransFusion: Robust LiDAR-Camera Fusion for 3D Object Detection with Transformerscited by 464
- 2022FUTR3D: A Unified Sensor Fusion Framework for 3D Detectioncited by 194
- 2022M2BEV: Multi-Camera Joint 3D Detection and Segmentation with Unified Birds-Eye View Representationcited by 155
5 more
- 2019WoodScape: A multi-task, multi-camera fisheye dataset for autonomous drivingcited by 142
- 2021FusionPainting: Multimodal Fusion with Adaptive Attention for 3D Object Detectioncited by 92
- 2022AutoAlign: Pixel-Instance Feature Aggregation for Multi-Modal 3D Object Detectioncited by 70
- 2023RoboBEV: Towards Robust Bird's Eye View Perception under Corruptionscited by 42
- 2025Minimizing Occlusion Effect on Multi-View Camera Perception in BEV with Multi-Sensor Fusioncited by 3
Built on by
Not cited yet.